Hostname: page-component-669899f699-rg895 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T17:36:07.865Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Unstable Motion of an Edge Dislocation in a Solute Atom Atmosphere Studied by Kinetic Monte Carlo Simulations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

X. M. Gu  and
Y. Q. Sun
X. M. Gu
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and EngineeringUniversity of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
Y. Q. Sun
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and EngineeringUniversity of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
Get access

Abstract

The discontinuous yielding of a model material, which contains an edge dislocation moving in the atmosphere of solute atoms, is studied by Kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC) simulations. The stress-strain curves for a constant strain rate were obtained at different temperatures. The dislocation moves discontinuously, producing three types of serrated yielding behavior at intermediate temperatures for different imposed strain rates. Positive dependence of flow stress on temperature and negative strain rate sensitivity were observed in the regime of discontinuous motion. The present model, though highly simplified and not taking into account the collective behaviors of dislocations in real materials, does exhibit some of the basic features observed in experiments.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 653: Symposium Z – Multiscale Modeling of Materials-2000 , 2000 , Z4.7.1
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Penning, P., Acta metall., 20, 1169 (1972).10.1016/0001-6160(72)90165-4Google Scholar
2. Kubin, L. P. and Estrin, Y., Acta metall., 33, 295 (1985).10.1016/0001-6160(85)90082-3Google Scholar
3. Lebyodkin, M. A., Brechet, Y., Estrin, Y. and Kubin, L. P., Phys. Rev. Lett., 74, 4758 (1995).Google Scholar
4. Basinski, Z. S., Szczerba, M. S. and Embury, J. D., Phil. Mag., A, 76, 743 (1997).10.1080/01418619708214207Google Scholar
5. Rajesh, S. and Ananthakrishna, G., Phys. Rev. E, 61, 3664 (2000).Google Scholar
6. McCormick, P. G., Acta metall., 20, 351 (1972).10.1016/0001-6160(72)90028-4Google Scholar
7. Cottrell, A. H., Dislocations and Plastic Flow in Crystals, Clarendon Press, Oxford (1953).Google Scholar
8. Zbib, H. M. and Aifantis, E. C., Scripta. metall., 22, 1331 (1988).10.1016/S0036-9748(88)80157-1Google Scholar
9. Ananthakrishna, G. and Sahoo, D., J. Phys. D, 15, 2081 (1981).10.1088/0022-3727/14/11/015Google Scholar
10. Wang, Y., Srolovitz, D. J., Rickman, J.M. and Lesar, R., Acta mater., 48, 2163 (2000).10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00035-5Google Scholar
11. Hirth, J. P. and Lothe, J., Theory of Dislocations, 2nd ed. (Kridger Publishing Company, Malabar, Florida, 1982).Google Scholar
12. Bortz, A. B., Kalos, M.H. and Lebowitz, J. L., J. Comput. Phys. 17, 10 (1975).Google Scholar
13. Keh, A. S., Nakada, Y. and Leslie, W. C., Dislocation Dynamics, ed. Rosenfield, Alan R., McGraw-Hill New York, 1968.Google Scholar