Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:22:41.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ultrathin Alumina Films on Metallic Substrates: Structure and Metal Adsorption

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Dwight R. Jennison
Affiliation:
Surface and Interface Sciences Department, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185–1421
Alexander Bogicevic
Affiliation:
Surface and Interface Sciences Department, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185–1421
Get access

Abstract

First principles density functional calculations are used to study the structure and properties of ultrathin films of alumina on Al(111) and Ru(0001) substrates. We focus on ∼5 Å two O-layer films, naturally produced by oxidizing NiAl, Ni3Al, and Al deposited on Ru(0001). The interface consists of chemisorbed l×1 oxygen on the underlying metal [1], with a nearly coplanar layer of Al2O3 above. The lowest energy structure of the Al-sublattice is found to consist of zig-zag rows of octahedral and tetrahedral Al ions, resembling the bulk κ-phase. Eleven different adsorbed metals, spanning the periodic table, have been studied [2]. At low coverage the bond is purely ionic; at high coverage most metals bind principally by polarization. Contrary to speculations, isolated vacancies are found on MgO(100) not to directly promote metal nucleation [3], and we suggest this behavior is general. However, ad-OH is found not only to promote island nucleation, but can also, in high concentrations, produce wetting of alumina by Cu [4].

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Jennison, D. R., et al., Phys. Rev. B 59, R15605 (1999).Google Scholar
2. Bogicevic, A. and Jennison, D. R., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4050 (1999).Google Scholar
3. Bogicevic, A. and Jennison, D. R., Surf. Sci. (submitted).Google Scholar
4. J. A. Kelber et al., Surf. Sci. (submitted).Google Scholar