Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-21T12:02:27.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two-Dimensional and Multi-Experimental Modeling of Polycrystalline Cu(In,Ga)Se2 Solar Cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

W. K. Metzger ,
M. Gloeckler  and
R. K. Ahrenkiel
W. K. Metzger
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401
M. Gloeckler
Affiliation:
Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
R. K. Ahrenkiel
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401
Get access

Abstract

We use two-dimensional simulations to explore if charged columnar grain boundaries (GBs) in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 (CIGS) solar cells increase device performance. Although the simulations confirm that charged GBs can increase photocurrent by forming minority-carrier collection channels, this generally occurs at the expense of overall efficiency. Furthermore, improvements in photocurrent require significant GB minority collection beyond a diffusion length of the space-charge region. This collection from deep within the base can be detected by quantum efficiency (QE) spectra, electron-beam-induced current (EBIC) experiments, near-field scanning optical microscopy (NSOM), and fast photoluminescence decay. Simulations of all these experiments indicate that GB charge sufficient to significantly increase photocurrent collection is generally inconsistent with actual observations.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 865: Symposium F – Thin-Film Compound Semiconductor Photovoltaics , 2005 , F10.4
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Jiang, C.S., Noufi, R., Ramanathan, K., AbuShama, J.A., Moutinho, H.R., and Al-Jassim, M.M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 2625 (2004).Google Scholar
2 Fisher, V., Cohen, S.R., Ruzin, A., and Cahen, D., Advanced Materials 16, 879 (2004).Google Scholar
3 Repins, I.L. et al. , Prog. in Photovoltaics, in press.Google Scholar
4 Metzger, W.K. and Gloeckler, M., J. Appl. Phys., submitted.Google Scholar
5 Gloeckler, M., Fahrenbruch, A.L., and Sites, J.R., in Proc. 3rd World Conf. Photovoltaic Energy Conversion (2003), pp. 491–494.Google Scholar
6 Grovenor, C.R.M., J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 18, 4079 (1985).Google Scholar
7 Woods, L.M., Robinson, G.Y., and Levi, D.H., in Proceedings of 28th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (Anchorage, AK, 2000).Google Scholar
8Private conversation with Romero, M.J..Google Scholar
9 Liu, X.X. and Sites, J.R., J. Appl. Phys. 75, 577 (1993).Google Scholar
10 Metzger, W.K., Ahrenkiel, R.K., Dashdorj, J., and Friedman, D., Phys. Rev. B. 71 (2005).Google Scholar
11 Geisz, J.F., Reedy, R.C., Keyes, B.M., and Metzger, W.K., Cryst, J.. Growth 259, 223 (2003).Google Scholar
12 Smith, S., Zhang, P., Gessert, T., and Mascarenhas, A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 3854 (2004).Google Scholar
13 Gloeckler, M., Sites, J.R., and Metzger, W.K., J. Appl. Phys., submitted (2005).Google Scholar