Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:35:07.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transient Deformation and Flow in Bulk Metallic Glasses and Deeply Undercooled Glass Forming Liquids — A Self-Consistent Dynamic Free Volume Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

Sven Bossuyt
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge, Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, UK.
Marios D. Demetriou
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology, Keck Laboratory of Engineering Materials 138–78, Pasadena, California 91125.
William L. Johnson
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology, Keck Laboratory of Engineering Materials 138–78, Pasadena, California 91125.
Get access

Abstract

Recently, a self-consistent dynamic free volume model was proposed to analyze the Newtonian and non-Newtonian uniform steady-state flow data for bulk glass forming liquids such as those of the Zr-Ti-Cu-Ni-Be Vitreloy family. The model is based on the traditional free volume model of the glass transition, the Vogel-Fulcher-Tammann (VFT) equation, and a simple treatment of free volume production and annihilation during flow. It was shown that the model results in a simple one-parameter fit to extend the VFT equation for Newtonian flow to non-Newtonian uniform steady-state flow. We further extend the model to include transient uniform flow, by considering the evolution of free volume with time.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Masuhr, A., Waniuk, T.A., Busch, R. and Johnson, W.L., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2290 (1999).Google Scholar
2. Inoue, A., Kawamura, Y., Shibata, T. and Sasamori, K., Mater. Trans. JIM 37, 1337 (1996).Google Scholar
3. Egry, I., Lohöfer, G., Seyhan, I., Schneider, S. and Feuerbacher, B., Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 462 (1998).Google Scholar
4. Lu, J., Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology (2003).Google Scholar
5. de Hey, P., Sietsma, J. and van den Beukel, A., Acta Mater. 46, 5873 (1998).Google Scholar
6. Chen, H.S., Kato, H. and Inoue, A., Mater. Trans. 42(4), 597 (2001).Google Scholar
7. Spaepen, F., Acta Metall. 25, 407 (1977).Google Scholar
8. Steif, P.S., Spaepen, F. and Hutchinson, J.W., Acta Metall. 30, 447 (1982).Google Scholar
9. Johnson, W.L., Lu, J. and Demetriou, M.D., Intermetallics, In Press (2003).Google Scholar
10. Busch, R., Masuhr, A. and Johnson, W.L., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 304–306, 97 (2001).Google Scholar