Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-rj9fg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-09T09:28:14.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transformation Behavior in Austempering Nodular Iron

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

R. B. Gundlach ,
J. F. Janowak ,
S. Bechet  and
K. Röhrig
R. B. Gundlach
Affiliation:
AMAX Materials Research Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
J. F. Janowak
Affiliation:
Climax Molybdenum Co., Arlington Heights, IL, USA
S. Bechet
Affiliation:
AMAX Europe S.A., Paris, France
K. Röhrig
Affiliation:
Climax Molybdenum GmbH, Dusseldorf, W. Germany
Get access

Extract

Interest in austempered bainitic ductile irons has increased dramatically in the past few years as more and more successful applications are being reported. The remarkable combination of properties attainable has caused this material to emerge as a new class of ductile iron. Austempered ductile irons achieve strength levels as high as twice those of standard ductile iron grades at the same level of toughness and ductility, see Figure 1. In addition they respond to work-hardening treatments at the surface and thus have exceptionally high bending fatigue strength and wear resistance. These good properties are directly related to the unique bainite-austenite microstructure produced by austempering.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 34: Symposium – Physical Metallurgy of Cast Iron , 1984 , 399
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Atlas of Isothermal Transformation and Cooling Transformation Diagrams, ASM, Metals Park, Ohio (1977).Google Scholar
2. Dorazil, E. and Kraus, V., Slévérenstvi, 18, 503–506 (1970).Google Scholar
3. Johansson, M., AFS Trans., 85, 117–122 (1977).Google Scholar
4. Bhadeshia, H. K. D. H. and Edmonds, D. V., Metall. Trans. 10A, 1895 (1979).Google Scholar
5. Matas, S. J. and Hehemann, R. F., Trans. AIME, 221, 179–185 (1961).Google Scholar
6. Sandvik, B. P. J., Metallurgical Transactions, 13A, 777–787 (May 1982).10.1007/BF02642391Google Scholar
7. Bhadeshia, H. K. D. H. and Waugh, A. R., Acta Metall., 775–784 (1982).10.1016/0001-6160(82)90075-XGoogle Scholar
8. Dorazil, E., Giesserei Praxis, 18, 355–366 (1979).Google Scholar
9. Shiokawa, T., 59th Japan Ductile Cast Iron Assoc. Licensee Conf. (November 1978).Google Scholar
10. Breedon, J., British Cast Iron Research Association.Google Scholar
11. Janowak, J. F. and Gundlach, R. B., AFS Trans., 86, 377–388 (1983) (also Climax publication M–607).Google Scholar
12. Janowak, J. F. and Morton, P. A., AFS Trans., 87 (1984).Google Scholar
13. Park, Y. J., Morton, P. A., Gagne, M. and Goller, R., AFS Trans., 87 (1984).Google Scholar
14. Dorazil, E., Barta, B., and Munsterova, E., Giessereitechnik, 19, No. 3, 79–83 (March 1973).Google Scholar
15. Lo-Kan, Fonderie, No. 367, 167–169 (May 1977).Google Scholar
16. Sandvik, B. P. J. and Nevalainen, H. P., Metals Technology, 8, No. 6, 213–220 (June 1981).10.1179/030716981803275992Google Scholar