Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:34:16.402Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Toxicological Profiles of Nanomaterials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Erik K Rushton ,
Günter Oberdörster  and
Jacob Finkelstein
Erik K Rushton
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Rochester, Environmental Medicine, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY, 14642, United States
Günter Oberdörster
Affiliation:
[email protected]
Jacob Finkelstein
Affiliation:
[email protected]
Get access

Abstract

With the passage of the National Nanoscale Initiative in 2001 there has been increasing attention and funding given to nanomaterial research. This has led to a number of new materials developed at the nanoscale (< 100 nm) level, which often possess chemical and physical properties distinct from those of their bulk materials. These unique qualities are proving to be quite useful in a number of new applications. For example, biological applications in imaging, treatment, and drug delivery are particularly promising as well as the increasing engineering potential of nanocircuitry and materials science. As the number of applications increases however, so too does the potential for human exposure to nanomaterials through a number of routes: dermal, ingestion, inhalation, and even injection. Interestingly some of the properties of these nanomaterials that make them useful in these emerging technologies are the same properties that can increase their toxic potential. This is leading to an emerging discipline – nanotoxicology, which can be defined as safety evaluation of engineered nanostructures and nanodevices. Nanotoxicology research will not only provide information for risk assessment of nanomaterials based on data for hazard identification, dose response relationships and biokinetics, but will also help to further advance the field of nanoresearch by providing information to alter undesirable nanomaterials properties. Although nanotoxicology is in its infancy, there are some preliminary studies with newly developed materials that provide some insight into potential effects, which when coupled with older studies provides some insight on how these nanomaterials impact the biological system. This presentation summarizes results of studies with nanosized particles with a focus on the respiratory system and skin as portals of entry. The ability of particles to translocate from their site of entry, their ability to elicit biological responses, and their presumed mechanisms of action will be highlighted. This will be an attempt to illustrate how pervasive these materials can be, which may or may not be detrimental. With proper toxicological assessment this potential may be harnessed leading to breakthroughs at the nanotechnology – biology interface.

Keywords

nanostructurebiologicaloxidation
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 895: Symposium G – Life-Cycle Analysis Tools for “Green” Materials and Process Selection , 2005 , 0895-G04-01-S04-01
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Larson, D. R., et al. , Water-soluble quantum dots for multiphoton fluorescence imaging in vivo. Science, 2003. 300(5624): p. 1434–6.Google Scholar
2. Hilger, I., et al. , Thermal ablation of tumors using magnetic nanoparticles: an in vivo feasibility study. Invest Radiol, 2002. 37(10): p. 580–6.Google Scholar
3. Bodian D, H. H., The rate of progression of poliomyelitis virus in nerves. Bull Johns Hopkins Hospital, 1941. 69((2)): p. 79–85.Google Scholar
4. Smith, A. E. and Helenius, A., How viruses enter animal cells. Science, 2004. 304(5668): p. 237–42.Google Scholar
5. Drinker P, T.R., Finn, JL Metal fume fever. III. The effects of inhaling magnesium oxide fume. J Ind Hyg, 1927. 9: p. 187192.Google Scholar
6. Jotten, K. W. and Klosterkotter, W., [The importance of the solubility of silicic acid in the pathogenesis of the pneumoconioses.]. Arch Hyg Bakteriol, 1952. 136(1): p. 1–4.Google Scholar
7. deLorenzo, A., The olfactory neuron and the blood-brain barrier. In: Taste and Smell in Vertebrates, Wolstenholme G, K. J., Editor. 1970, Churchill: London. p. 151–176.Google Scholar
8. Katz, L. C., Burkhalter, A., and Dreyer, W. J., Fluorescent latex microspheres as a retrograde neuronal marker for in vivo and in vitro studies of visual cortex. Nature, 1984. 310(5977): p. 498–500.Google Scholar
9. Berry JP, A. B., Stanislas, G, Galle, P, Chretien, J., A microanalytic study of particles transport across the alveoli: role of blood platelets. Biomedicine, 1977. 27: p. 354–357.Google Scholar
10. ICRP(1994), Human respiratory tract model for radiological protection, in Technical report ICRP publication 66. 1994, International Commission on Radiological Protection.Google Scholar
11. Donaldson, K. and Stone, V., Current hypotheses on the mechanisms of toxicity of ultrafine particles. Ann Ist Super Sanita, 2003. 39(3): p. 405–10.Google Scholar
12. Tinkle, S. S., et al. , Skin as a route of exposure and sensitization in chronic beryllium disease. Environ Health Perspect, 2003. 111(9): p. 1202–8.Google Scholar