Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:50:30.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards Fabrication Information Modeling (FIM): Four Case Models to Derive Designs informed by Multi-Scale Trans-Disciplinary Data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2015

Jorge Duro-Royo  and
Neri Oxman
Jorge Duro-Royo
Affiliation:
Massachustes Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture and Urban Panning, Media Lab, Mediated Matter Group, 75 Amherst St., Room E14-333, Cambridge, MA, 02142 U.S.A.
Neri Oxman*
Affiliation:
Massachustes Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture and Urban Panning, Media Lab, Mediated Matter Group, 75 Amherst St., Room E14-333, Cambridge, MA, 02142 U.S.A.
*
2Corresponding author’s email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Despite recent advancements in digital fabrication and manufacturing, limitations associated with computational tools are preventing further progress in the design of non-standard architectures. This paper sets the stage for a new theoretical framework and an applied approach for the design and fabrication of geometrically and materially complex functional designs coined Fabrication Information Modeling (FIM). We demonstrate systems designed to integrate form generation, digital fabrication, and material computation starting from the physical and arriving at the virtual environment. The paper reviews four computational strategies for the design of custom systems through multi-scale trans-disciplinary data, which are classified and ordered by the level of overlap between the modeling media and the fabrication media: (1) the first model takes as input biological data and outputs 3D printed digital materials organized according to functional constraints; (2) the second model takes as input geometry and environmental data and outputs robotically wound fibers organized according to functional constraints; (3) the third model takes as input material and environmental data and outputs CNC deposited pastes organized according to functional constraints; (4) the forth model takes as input biological, material and environmental data and outputs robotically deposited polymers organized according to functional constraints. The analysis of these models will demonstrate the FIM approach and point towards its value to designers who seek to inform their work through multi-scale transdisciplinary data, a capability that is currently missing from standard design-to-fabrication workflows.

Keywords

structuralSustainabilityfiber
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1800: Symposium NN – Adaptive Architecture and Programmable Matter―Next Generation Building Skins and Systems from Nano to Macro , 2015 , mrss15-2138549
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Vincent, J., Bogatyreva, O. A., et al. Biomimetics: its practice and theory. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 2006; 3:471–482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oxman, N. Material-Based Design Computation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2010.Google Scholar
Oxman, N. Structuring materiality: design fabrication of heterogeneous materials. Architectural Design 2010; 80:78–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxman, N. Variable property rapid prototyping. Virtual and Physical Prototyping 2011; 6:3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duro-Royo, J., Zolotovsky, K., Mogas-Soldevila, L., Varshney, S., Oxman, N., Boyce, M.C., Ortiz, C. MetaMesh: A hierarchical computational model for design and fabrication of biomimetic armor surfaces. Computer-Aided Design Elsevier 2014; in press.Google Scholar
Biswas, A., Fenves, J.S., Shapiro, V. Representation of heterogeneous material properties in the Core Product Model. Engineering with Computers 2008; 24:43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, V., Tsukanov, I., et al. Modeling and analysis of objects having heterogeneous material properties. Google Patents 2004.Google Scholar
Shapiro, V., Tsukanov, I., et al. Geometric issues in computer aided de- sign/computer aided engineering integration. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 2011; 11:021005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiu, W. and Yu, K. Direct digital manufacturing of three-dimensional functionally graded material objects. Computer-Aided Design 2008; 40:1080–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biswas, A., Shapiro, V. Heterogeneous material modeling with distance fields. Computer Aided Geometric Design 2004; 21:215–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidimce, K., Wang, S., Ragan-Kelley, J., Matusik, W. OpenFab: A Programmable Pipeline for Multi-Material Fabrication. SIGGRAPH Conference Proceedings 2013; 32:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kou, X.Y., Tan, S. T. Heterogeneous Object Modeling: A review. Computer-Aided Design 2013; 39:284–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hon, K.K.B. Additive Manufacturing Technologies: Rapid Prototyping to Direct Digital Manufacturing. Springer 2010.Google Scholar
Gibson, I., Rosen, D. W., et al. Direct digital manufacturing. Additive manufacturing technologies Springer 2010; 363–384.Google Scholar
Duro-Royo, J., Mogas-Soldevila, L., Oxman, N. Flow-Based Fabrication: An Integrated Computational Workflow for Digital Design and Additive Manufacturing of Multifunctional Heterogeneously Structured Objects. Computer-Aided Design Journal 2015 (in revision).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mogas-Soldevila, L., Duro-Royo, J., Oxman, N. Water-based Robotic Fabrication: Large-Scale Additive Manufacturing of Functionally-Graded Hydrogel Composites via Multi-Chamber Extrusion. 3D Printing and Ad- ditive Manufacturing 2014; 1:1–11.Google Scholar
Kieback, B., Neubrand, A., Riedel, H. Processing techniques for functionally graded materials. Materials Science and Engineering 2003; 362:81–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malone, E. and Lipson, H. Multi-material freeform fabrication of active systems. ASME 2008 9th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis American Society of Mechanical Engineers 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiller, J. and Lipson, H. Design and analysis of digital materials for physical 3D voxel printing. Rapid Prototyping Journal 2009; 15:137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiller, J. and Lipson, H. Tunable digital material properties for 3D voxel printers. Rapid Prototyping Journal 2010; 16:241–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, L., Merz, R., et al. Shape deposition manufacturing of heterogeneous structures. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 1997; 16:239–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, V. and Dutta, D. An approach to modeling and representation of heterogeneous objects. Journal of Mechanical Design 1998; 120:659–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samanta, K. and Koc, B. Feature-based design and material blending for free-form heterogeneous object modeling. Computer-Aided Design2005; 37:287–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siu, Y.K. and Tan, S.T. Modeling the material grading and structures of heterogeneous objects for layered manufacturing. Computer-Aided Design 2002; 34:705–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kou, X. and Tan, S. A hierarchical representation for heterogeneous object modeling. Computer-Aided Design 2005; 37:307–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biswas, A., Shapiro, V., et al. Heterogeneous material modeling with distance fields. Computer Aided Geometric Design 2004; 21:215–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, J. and Shapiro, V. Optimization of continuous heterogeneous models. Heterogeneous objects modeling and applications Springer 2008;193–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, M.J. Modeling of Material Property Variation for Layered Manufacturing. In: Cipolla, R. and Martin, R., editors. The Mathematics of Surfaces IX Springer 2000;486–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxman, N., Laucks, J., Kayser, M., Duro-Royo, J., Gonzales-Uribe, C. Silk Pavilion: A Case Study in Fiber-based Digital Fabrication. FABRICATE Conference Proceedings 2013; 248–255.Google Scholar
Oxman, N., Duro-Royo, J., Keating, S., Peters, B., Tsai, E. Towards Swarm Printing. Made by Robots: Challenging Architecture at a Larger Scale. Architectural Design Special Issue 2014; 84:3:108–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oosterhuis, K. File to Factory and Real Time Behavior in Architecture. Fabrication: Examining the Digital Practice of Architecture. Proceedings of Conference of the AIA Technology in Architectural Practice Knowledge Community Cambridge/Ontario 2004.Google Scholar
Afify, H. M. and Elghaffar, Z. A. A. Advanced Digital Manufacturing Techniques (CAM) in Architecture Authors. Proceedings of the 3rd International ASCAAD Conference 2007.Google Scholar
Scheurer, F. Materializing complexity. Architectural Design 2010; 80:86–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oosterhuis, K., Bier, H., Aalbers, C., Boer, S. File-to-Factory and Real- Time Behavior in ONL-Architecture. AIA/ACADIA Fabrication: Examining the Digital Practice of Architecture, University of Waterloo School of Architecture Press 2007;.294–305.Google Scholar
Sheil, B. De-Fabricating Protoarchitecture. In: Stacey, M., editor. Proto- typing Architecture Conference Building Centre Trust London 2013;372–390.Google Scholar
Sass, L. and Oxman, R. Materializing design: the implications of rapid prototyping in digital design. Design Studies 2006; 27:325–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, C. Direct slicing and G-code contour for rapid prototyping machine of UV resin spray using PowerSOLUTION macro commands. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2004; 23:358–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farouki, R. T., Manjunathaiah, J., et al. G codes for the specification of Pythagoreanhodograph tool paths and associated feed rate functions on open-architecture CNC machines. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 1999; 39:123–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeel, R. Grasshopper generative modeling for Rhino, Computer soft- ware (2011b), http://www.grasshopper3d.com 2010.Google Scholar
Duro Royo, J., Mogas Soldevila, L. and Oxman, N. Methods and Apparatus for Integrated Large Scale Robotic Fabrication of Functionally Graded Materials and Structures. US provisional patent pending (M.I.T. Case No. 17388T) 2014.Google Scholar
Sun, W., Starly, B., Nam, J., Darling, A. Bio-CAD modeling and its applications in computer-aided tissue engineering. Computer-Aided Design 2005; 37:1097–1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar