Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:34:04.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Toughening of Intermetallics by Coated Ductile Reinforcements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

H. E. Deve
Affiliation:
Materials Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106.
A. G. Evans
Affiliation:
Materials Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106.
R. Mehrabian
Affiliation:
Materials Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106.
Get access

Abstract

The effects of reinforcement debonding and work hardening on ductile reinforcement toughening of γ-TiAl have been examined. Debonding has been varied by either the development of a brittle reaction product layer or by depositing a thin oxide coating between the reinforcement and matrix. The role of work hardening has been explored by comparing Nb reinforcements that exhibits high work hardening with solution hardened Ti-Nb alloy that exhibits negligible work hardening. It is demonstrated that a high work of rupture is encouraged by extensive debonding when the reinforcement exhibits high work hardening. Conversely, debonding is not beneficial when the reinforcement exhibits low work hardening.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Sigl, L. S., Evans, A. G., Mataga, P., McMeeking, R. M. and Dagleish, B. J., Acta Metall., 36 946, (1988).Google Scholar
[2] Ashby, M. F., Blunt, F. J. and Bannister, M., Acta Metall., 37, 1847, (1989).Google Scholar
[3] Cao, H. C., Dalgleish, B. J., Déve, H. E., Elliott, C., Evans, A. G., Mehrabian, R. and Odette, G. R., (in press), Acta Metall. Google Scholar
[4] Elliott, C. K., Odette, G. R., Lucas, G. E. and Sheckard, J. W., MRS Proceedings, vol 120, p. 95, (1988).Google Scholar
[5] Krstic, V. D., Phil Mag., A 48, 695, (1983).Google Scholar
[6] Budiansky, B., Amazigo, J. C. and Evans, A. G., J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 36 167, (1988).Google Scholar
[7] Evans, A. G. and McMeeking, R. M., Acta Metall., 34, 2435, (1986).Google Scholar
[8] Mataga, P. A., Acta Metall., (in press).Google Scholar
[9] Odette, G. R., Elliott, C. K., Lucas, G. E. and Sheckhard, J. W., to be published.Google Scholar
[10] Dalgleish, B. J., Trumble, K. and Evans, A. G., Acta Metall., 37, 1923, (1989).Google Scholar
[11] Dève, H.E., Evans, A.G., Odette, G.R., Mehrabian, R., Emiliani, M.L., Hecht, R., to be published.Google Scholar
[12] Mader, W. and Riihle, M., Acta Metall. 37, 853, (1989).Google Scholar
[13] Tressler, R. E., Moore, T. L. and Crane, R. L., J. of Mat. Sci., 151, (1973).Google Scholar
[14] Charalambides, P. G., Lund, J., Evans, A. G. and McMeeking, R. M., 1. of Appl. Mech., 56,77, (1989).Google Scholar
[15] Zok, F. and Hom, C., to be published.Google Scholar
[16] Zok, F., Jansson, S., Evans, A. G. and Nardonne, V., to be published.Google Scholar