Hostname: page-component-669899f699-g7b4s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-24T23:28:03.485Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Time Dependent Nucleation in a Bulk Metallic Glass Forming Alloy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

T. K Croat  and
K. F. Kelton
T. K Croat
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Washington University, Saint Louis, MO 63130, [email protected]
K. F. Kelton
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Washington University, Saint Louis, MO 63130, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The effect of composition on the time-dependent nucleation rates in Zr65Al7.5Ni10CU17.5 glasses is investigated to better understand nucleation processes in partitioning systems. Asquenched glasses were annealed to produce a homogeneous dispersion of nanocrystals within the amorphous matrix. The nucleation rates were estimated from the number of crystallites produced as function of annealing time, using scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Experimental results for single and multiple-step annealing treatments are presented. The nucleation results are discussed briefly within the time-dependent model of the classical theory of nucleation.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 481: Symposium P – Science and Technology of Semiconductor Surface Preparation , 1997 , 137
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Foley, J.C., Allen, D.R. and Perepezko, J.H., Scripta Materialia, 35, p. 655 (1996).Google Scholar
2. Calin, M. and Koster, U., Proceedings of ISMANAM-97, Barcelona, Spain (1997).Google Scholar
3. Schneider, S., Thiyagarajan, P. and Johnson, W.L., Appl. Phys. Lett., 68, p. 493 (1996).Google Scholar
4. Busch, R., Schneider, S., Pecker, A. and Johnson, W.L., Appl. Phys. Lett., 67, p. 1544 (1995).Google Scholar
5. Buchwitz, M., Adlwarth-Dieball, R. and Ryder, P. L., Acta Metall. Mater. 41, no. 6, p. 1885–1892 (1993).Google Scholar
6. Koster, U. and Blank-Bewersdorff, M., Mater. Res. Soc. Conf. Proc. 57, p. 115 (1987).Google Scholar
7. Kelton, K.F. and Greer, A.L., Phys. Rev. B., 38, 10089 (1988); J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 74, 1015 (1991).Google Scholar
8. Lin, X.H., Johnson, W.L. and Rhim, W.K., Materials Transactions, JIM 5, p. 473 (1997).Google Scholar
9. Croat, T.K. and K.F.Kelton, (submitted).Google Scholar
10. Kim, W.J. and Kelton, K.F., Phil. Mag. Lett. 76, 199 (1997).Google Scholar
11. Yavari, A.R. and Bochu, B., Philos. Mag. A, 59, p. 697 (1987).Google Scholar
12. Holzer, J.C. and Kelton, K.F., Acta Metall. Mater. 39, 1833 (1991).Google Scholar
13. Molokanov, V.V., Petrzhik, M.I., Mikhailova, T.N. and Kovneristyi, Y.K., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 205–207, p. 508–513 (1996).Google Scholar
14. James, P.F., Phys. Chem. Glasses, 15, 95 (1974).Google Scholar
15. Kelton, K.F. and Falster, R.J. in Defects and Diffusion in Silicon Processing, (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 469, San Francisco, CA, 1997 (in press).Google Scholar
16. Kelton, K.F., Phil. Mag. Lett. (submitted).Google Scholar