Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:44:14.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thermodynamical Behaviour of Quartz Around the Transitions Between α, Incommensurate and β Phases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

G. Dolino
Affiliation:
Université Scientifique et Médicale de Grenoble Laboratoire de Spectrométrie Physique (associé au C.N.R.S.) Boite postale n° 68, 38402 Saint-Martin-d'Hères Cedex, France
J.P. Bachheimer
Affiliation:
Université Scientifique et Médicale de Grenoble Laboratoire de Spectrométrie Physique (associé au C.N.R.S.) Boite postale n° 68, 38402 Saint-Martin-d'Hères Cedex, France
Get access

Abstract

Recently an intermediate incommensurate phase has been found around 846 K in a small temperature range of 1.3 K between the usual α and β phases of quartz. In the neighborhood of these transitions most physical properties show drastic variations which has remained a puzzle. We shall present some measurements of the heat capacity Cp and of thermal expansion coefficients αi which present very large variations in the incommensurate phase. These divergences can be related by Pippard-Garland relations in the 3 phases. Furthermore in the low temperature α phase this result can be explained by the existence of a macroscopic order parameter η related to SiO4 tetrahedra, and varying as predicted by the Landau theory of 1st order phase transition. While in the high temperature phases (β and incommensurate) η vanishes, it takes a finite value in α phase, increasing continuously upon further cooling. However at the microscopic level, the discontinuity is reduced by the existence of the incommensurate phase, which corresponds probably to modulated tilting of SiO4 tetrahedra.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Dolino, G. and Bachheimer, J. P., Ferroelectrics 43, 77 (1982)Google Scholar
2. Bachheimer, J. P., Journal de Physique Lettres 41, L 559 (1980)Google Scholar
3. Dolino, G., Bachheimer, J. P. and Zeyen, C.M.E., Solid State Communications 45, 295 (1983), J. de Physique (Paris) (to be published)Google Scholar
4. Moser, H., Physik Z. 37, 737 (1936)Google Scholar
5. Sinelnikov, N. N., Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR, 92, 369 (1953)Google Scholar
6. O'Neil, N. J. and Fyans, F. L., Perkin Elmer Thermal analysis literature MA-9 (1971)Google Scholar
7. Pippard, A. B., The elements of classical thermodynamics (Cambridge University Press, New York, (1957))Google Scholar
8. Garland, C. W., The J. of Chem. Phys. 41, 1005 (1964)Google Scholar
9. Klement, W. and Cohen, L. H., J. Geophys. Res. 73, 2249 (1968)Google Scholar
10. Coe, R. S. and Paterson, M. S., J. Geophys. Res. 73, 2249 (1968)Google Scholar
11. Bachheimer, J. P. and Dolino, G., Ferroelectrics 25, 423 (1980)Google Scholar
12. Mayer, G., Rapport CEA (France) n° 1330 (1960)Google Scholar
13. Strelkov, P. G., Lifanov, I. I. and Sherstyukov, N. G., Izmeritel'naya Tekhnica, 7, 8 (1966)Google Scholar
14. Bachheimer, J. P. and Dolino, G., Phys. Rev. B 11, 3195 (1975)Google Scholar
15. Wright, A. F. and Lehmann, M. S., J. Solid State Chem. 36, 371 (1981)Google Scholar