Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:10:44.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thermodynamic modeling and experimental tests of irradiated graphite molten salt decontamination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2013

Olga Karlina
Affiliation:
Moscow SIA «Radon», 119121, Moscow, 7-th Rostovsky per., 2/14, Russia
Michael Ojovan
Affiliation:
Moscow SIA «Radon», 119121, Moscow, 7-th Rostovsky per., 2/14, Russia
Galina Pavlova
Affiliation:
Moscow SIA «Radon», 119121, Moscow, 7-th Rostovsky per., 2/14, Russia
Vsevolod Klimov
Affiliation:
Moscow SIA «Radon», 119121, Moscow, 7-th Rostovsky per., 2/14, Russia
Get access

Abstract

Molten salt flameless oxidation of graphite is one of the prospective methods of irradiated graphite waste processing. Molten salts are capable to retain a considerable part of radionuclides, to neutralize acidic off gases, moreover spent salts could be vitrified on completion of the process. We have used thermodynamic modelling to assess the efficiency of molten salt oxidation of graphite. Equilibrium compositions of both the melt and the off gas were calculated depending on graphite content and temperature. The feasibility of decontaminating the irradiated graphite of its near-surface layers using complete molten salt oxidation was investigated in a series of laboratory experiments. As the molten salt medium used to oxidize irradiated graphite we have investigated lithium, potassium and sodium carbonates. Sodium sulphate, boron oxide, barium and potassium chromates were also used as oxidizers. Tests were carried out at 870–1270 К. The efficiency of decontamination of graphite blocks has been assessed based on the activity of 137Cs and 60Со in the samples before and after molten salt oxidation. Data obtained demonstrated the feasibility of decontamination by molten salt removal of near surface layers on irradiated graphite blocks. Decontamination rate and efficiency depend on oxidizers used and temperature of process.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Karlina, O.K., Klimov, V.L., Pavlova, G.Yu., Ojovan, M.I.. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 1107, 109116 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gay, R.L., Rockwell International Corporation, U.S. Patent 5 449 505, 1995.Google Scholar
Romenkov, A.A., Tuktarov, M.A., Minkin, L.I., Pyshkin, V.P., Env. Safety, 3, 4447 (2006).Google Scholar
Trusov, B.G., Proceedings of GUP MosNPO “Radon” 13, 2225 (2007, in Russian).Google Scholar
Yungman, V.S., Thermal Constants of Substances. V. 1–8, Begell House, New York (1999).Google Scholar
Gurvich, L.V., Vestnik Akademiinauk SSSR, 3, 5465 (1983).Google Scholar
Lee, W.E., Ojovan, M. I., Stennett, M.C., Hyatt, N.C.. Advances in Applied Ceramics, 105, 3 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ojovan, M.I., Lee, W.E.. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 42(4), 837851 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bushuev, A.V., Verzilov, Yu.M., Zubarev, V.N. et al. . Atomic Energy, 92, 477485 (2002).Google Scholar
Bushuev, A.V., Verzilov, Yu.M., Zubarev, V.N. et al. . Atomic Energy, 89, 139146 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar