Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:33:18.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thermal Stability and Internal Stress for Strongly (111) Oriented Cu Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Sinji Takayama
Affiliation:
Dept. of Systems and Control, Hosei University, 3–7–2, Kajino-cho, Koganei, Tokyo, 184–8584, Japan
Makato Oikawa
Affiliation:
Dept. of Systems and Control, Hosei University, 3–7–2, Kajino-cho, Koganei, Tokyo, 184–8584, Japan
Tokuji Himuro
Affiliation:
Dept. of Systems and Control, Hosei University, 3–7–2, Kajino-cho, Koganei, Tokyo, 184–8584, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Internal stresses and thermal stability of strongly (111) oriented Cu thin films, which are one of promising interconnect materials in advanced ULSI devices, have been studied comparing with those of non-oriented Cu films. Their internal stresses parallel to a film surface were measured by a conventional X-ray diffraction technique (d-spacing vs. sin2ψ method), while the strain distribution with depth by a grazing incidence X-ray scattering (GIXS) methods. Large stress relaxation in strongly (111) oriented Cu films takes place at 200°C without showing any significant grain growth and formation of thermal defects like hillocks. The residual internal stresses of highly oriented (111) Cu films increase almost linearly throughout the thickness up to the substrates. The feature of stress distribution in film depth does not change on annealing. The changes of the residual stresses at each depth are nearly the same as stresses parallel to film surface measured.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Vaidya, S. and Shinha, A. F., Thin Solid Films, 75, 253 (1981).Google Scholar
2. Marra, W. C., Eisenberger, P., and Cho, A. Y., J. Appl. Phys. 50, 6927 (1970).Google Scholar
3. Brennan, S., Surf. Sci. 152/153, 1 (1985).Google Scholar
4. Nye, J. F.: Physical Properties of Crystals (Oxford University Press, London, 2001) pp. 131149.Google Scholar
5. Tabor, D.., “The Hardness of Solid,” Review of Physics in Technology, Vol. 1, 1970, pp. 145179.Google Scholar
6. Thompson, C. V., Script. Met., et Materia, 28, 167 (1993).Google Scholar
7. Nix, W. D., Met. Trans. 20A, 2217 (1989).Google Scholar
8. Murakami, M. and Yogi, T.: J. Appl. Phys. 57(2), 211 (1985).Google Scholar
9. Vook, R.W. and Witt, F.: J. Appl. Phys., 36, 2169 (1965).Google Scholar
10. Thouless, M. D., Gupta, J., and Harper, J. M. E., J. Mater. Res., 8 (8), 1845 (1993).Google Scholar