Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:19:00.799Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thermal Quenching of Photoconductivity and the Sign of Photocarriers in Doped a-Si:H

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

B.-G. Yoon
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Ulsan, Ulsan, 680–749, Republic of Korea
H. Fritzsche
Affiliation:
James Franck Institute, The University of Chicago, 5640 Ellis Ave., Chicago, IL 60637., USA
M. Q. Tran
Affiliation:
James Franck Institute, The University of Chicago, 5640 Ellis Ave., Chicago, IL 60637., USA
D.-Z. Chi
Affiliation:
James Franck Institute, The University of Chicago, 5640 Ellis Ave., Chicago, IL 60637., USA
Get access

Abstract

Thermal quenching (TQ) of photoconductivity σp occurs when the demarkation level of minority carriers passes through recombination centers having small capture cross section for majority carriers compared to other centers present but normal cross section for minority carriers. The photoconductivity becomes superlinear with light intensity at the temperature of maximum TQ. We discovered TQ not only in n-type but also p-type a-Si:H. This cannot happen with the same centers unless the sign of the majority carriers changes. We present evidence that in p-type and undoped films majority carriers are electrons at T below TQ and holes above TQ. The nature of these special centers will be discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Vanier, P.E., Delahoy, A.E. and Griffith, R.W., J. Appl. Phys. 52, 5235 (1981).Google Scholar
2. Persans, P.D., Philos Mag. B 46, 435 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Fuhs, W., Welsch, H.M. and Booth, D.C., phys. stat. sol. (b) 120, 197 (1983).Google Scholar
4. Carius, R., Hoheisel, M. and Fuhs, W., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 66, 151 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Carius, R., Fuhs, W. and Weber, K., in “Disordered Semiconductors,” edited by Kastner, M.A., Thomas, G.A. and Ovshinsky, S.R. (Plenum Press, NY, 1987) p. 369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Rose, A.Concepts in Photoconductivity and Allied Problems,” Wiley-Interscience, NY, 1963.Google Scholar
7. Crandall, R.S. in “Semiconductors and Semimetals” vol. 21B, edited by Pankove, J.I. (Academic Press, Orlando, FL, 1984) p. 245.Google Scholar
8. Hoheisel, M. and Fuhs, W., Philos. Mag. B 57, 411 (1988).Google Scholar
9. Yoon, B.-G. and Fritzsche, H., Philos. Mag. Lett. 63, 101 (1991).Google Scholar
10. Tiedje, T., Cebulka, J.M., Morel, D.L. and Abeles, B., Phys. Rev. Lett 46, 1425 (1981).Google Scholar
11. Allan, D., Philos. Mag. B 38, 381 (1978).Google Scholar
12. Dersch, H. and Schweitzer, L., Philos. Mag. B 50, 397 (1984).Google Scholar
13. Shklovskii, B.I., Levin, E.I., Fritzsche, H. and Baranovskii, S.D., in “Transport, Correlation and Structure Defects” edited by Fritzsche, H. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1990) p. 161 CrossRefGoogle Scholar