Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:57:25.102Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Theory of Porous Silicon Injection Electroluminescence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

H. Paul Maruska
Affiliation:
Spire Corporation, One Patriots Park, Bedford, MA 01730–2396
F. Namavar
Affiliation:
Spire Corporation, One Patriots Park, Bedford, MA 01730–2396
N. M. Kalkhoran
Affiliation:
Spire Corporation, One Patriots Park, Bedford, MA 01730–2396
Get access

Abstract

We discuss the operation of porous silicon light-emitting diodes prepared as heterojunctions between n-type In2O3:Sn (ITO) and p-type silicon nanostructures, exhibiting quantum confinement effects. The transparent ITO affords light emission through the top surface of the device, as well as providing passivation and hence long term stability. We describe a model for the injection of minority carrier electrons into the porous silicon regions, which results in the emission of yellow-orange DC electroluminescence. A detailed study of the forward bias current-voltage characteristics of the devices will be given, which allows calculations of the densities of interface states. A tendency to pin the hole fermi energy near the neutral level, φ0, is shown to control the extraction of majority carriers. Methods for improving LED efficiency by alleviating a parasitic shunt current path through interface states will be addressed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Kalkhoran, N.M., Namavar, F., and Maruska, H.P., in Light Emission from Silicon, edited by Iyer, S.S., Canham, L.T., and Collins, R.P. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1992) 256, p. 89.Google Scholar
2. Namavar, F., Maruska, H.P., and Kalkhoran, N.M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 60, 2514 (1992).Google Scholar
3. Perry, C.H., Lu, F., Namavar, F., Kalkhoran, N.M., and Soref, R.A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 60, 3117 (1992).Google Scholar
4. Anderson, R.C., Muller, R.S., and Tobias, C.W., J. Electrochem. Soc. 138, 3406 (1991).Google Scholar
5. Ghosh, A.K., Fishman, C., and Feng, T., J. Appl. Phys. 50 3454 (1979).Google Scholar
6. Maruska, H.P., Ghosh, A.K., Eustace, D.J., and Feng, T., J. Appl. Phys. 54, 2489 (1983).Google Scholar
7. Card, H.C. and Rhoderick, E.H., J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 4, 1589 (1971).Google Scholar
8. Feng, T., Fishman, C., and Ghosh, A.K., Proc. 13th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conf., Washington, DC, June 1978 (IEEE Press, New York, 1978), pp. 519523.Google Scholar
9. Ghosh, A.K., Fishman, C., and Feng, T., J. Appl. Phys. 49, 3490 (1978).Google Scholar
10. Herino, R., Bomchil, G., Baria, K., Bertrand, C., J. Electrochem. Soc. 134, 1994 (1987).Google Scholar
11. Averkiev, N.S., Asnin, V.M., Churilov, A.B., Markov, L.I., Mokrousov, N.E., Yu. Silov, Y., Stepanov, V.I., JETP Lett. 55, 657 (1992).Google Scholar
12. Shewchun, J., DuBow, J., Myszkowski, A., and Singh, R., J. Appl. Phys. 49, 855 (1978).Google Scholar