Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:48:18.033Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Temperature Effects on Photocurrent Generation in Polymer Hetero—Junction Photovoltaic Devices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Mi Yeon Song ,
Kang-Jin Kim  and
Dong Yong Kim
Mi Yeon Song
Affiliation:
Optoelectronic Materials Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 131. Cheongryang, Seoul 130–650, Korea
Kang-Jin Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 136–701, Korea
Dong Yong Kim
Affiliation:
Optoelectronic Materials Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 131. Cheongryang, Seoul 130–650, Korea
Get access

Abstract

In a heterojunction photovoltaic device of ITO/TiO2/poly(3-alkylthiophene)/Au, the photocurrent was characterized with different temperature by using regio-random (P3HT), regular (RP3HT) poly(3-hexylthiophene) and regio-regular poly(3-dodecylthiophene)(RP3DT). The regio-regularity and alky chain length affected the photovoltaic characteristics due to the difference in the hole carrier transport. The drift charge mobility of those devices were analyzed by the space charge limited current (SCLC) theory using dark current versus bias relations. The photocurrent in the devices based on poly(3-alkylthiopene)s began to decrease rapidly below a temperature at which the drift charge mobility was 10−5 cm2/V.s.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 836: Symposium L – Materials for Photovoltaics , 2004 , L5.5
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Huynh, W. U., Dittmer, J. J. and Alivisatos, A. P., Science 295, 2425 (2002).Google Scholar
2. Coakley, K. M. and McGehee, M. D., Chem. Mater. 16, 4533 (2004).Google Scholar
3. Burroughes, J. H., Bradley, D. D. C., Brown, A. R., Marks, R. N., MacKay, K., Friend, R.H., Burn, P. L. and Holmes, A. B., Nature, 347, 539 (1990).Google Scholar
4. Schön, J. H., Kloc, C. and Batlogg, B., Nature, 406, 702 (2000).Google Scholar
5. Riedel, I., Parisi, J., Dyakonov, V., Dyakonov, V., Lutsen, L., Vanderzande, D. and Hummelen, J. C., Adv. Funct. Mater. 14, 38 (2004).Google Scholar
6. Chirvase, D., Chiguvare, Z., Knipper, M., Parisi, J., Dyakonov, V. and Hummelen, J. C., J. Appl. Phys. 93, 3376 (2003).Google Scholar
7. Takahashi, M., Tsukigi, K., Uchino, T. and Yoko, T., Thin Sol. Films 388, 231 (2001).Google Scholar
8. Leclerc, M., Diaz, F. M. and Wegner, G., Makromol. Chem. 190, 3105 (1989).Google Scholar
9. Fahrenbruch, A. L., Bube, R. H., “Fundamentals of Solar Cells”, (Academic Press, 1983) chapter 6.Google Scholar
10. Campbel, A. J., Bradley, D. D. C. and Lidzey, D. G., J. Appl. Phys. 82, 6326 (1997).Google Scholar