Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:24:12.474Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Temperature Dependent and Time Resolved Optical Studies of Single Quantum Wells Produced by Interrupted Growth MBE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

B. S. Elman
Affiliation:
GTE Laboratories Incorporated, 40 Sylvan Road, Waltham, MA 02254, USA
Emil S. Koteles
Affiliation:
GTE Laboratories Incorporated, 40 Sylvan Road, Waltham, MA 02254, USA
C. Jagannath
Affiliation:
GTE Laboratories Incorporated, 40 Sylvan Road, Waltham, MA 02254, USA
Y. J. Chen
Affiliation:
GTE Laboratories Incorporated, 40 Sylvan Road, Waltham, MA 02254, USA
S. Charbonneau
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C. V5A 1S6, Canada
M. L. W. Thewalt
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C. V5A 1S6, Canada
Get access

Abstract

Multiple peaks, recently observed in the low temperature photoluminescence (PL) spectra of GaAs/AlGaAs single quantum wells fabricated by momentarily interrupting the molecular beam epitaxial growth between adjacent but different semiconductor layers, have been interpreted as originating within smooth regions in the quantum well layer differing in width by exactly one monolayer. We have observed similar structure in similarly grown samples but find that low temperature PL can be misleading. However, higher temperature PL or PL excitation spectroscopy do provide unambiguous evidence for the model of interface smoothing due to growth interruption. Further, time-resolved spectra yield decay times of the individual peaks which are consistent with this idea.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Weisbuch, C., Dingle, R., Gossard, A.C., and Wiegman, W., Solid State Commun. 38, 709 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Deveaud, B., Emery, J.Y., Chomette, A., Lambert, B., and Baudet, M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 45, 1078 (1984).Google Scholar
3. Deveaud, B., Regreny, A., Emery, J.Y., and Chomette, A., J. Appl. Phys. 59, 1633 (1986).Google Scholar
4. Sakaki, H., Tanaka, M., and Yoshino, J., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 24, L417 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Hayakawa, T., Suyama, T., Takahashi, K., Kondo, M., Yamamoto, S., Yano, S., and Hijikata, T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 47, 952 (1985).Google Scholar
6. Voillot, F., Madhukar, A., Kim, J.Y., Chen, P., Cho, N.M., Tang, W.C., and Newman, P.G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 48, 1009 (1986).Google Scholar
7. A preliminary report on some of these findings has already been given (Koteles, E.S., Elman, B.S., Jagannath, C., and Chen, Y.J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 49, 1465 (1986).Google Scholar
Also, low temperature PLE of interrupted growth QWs has been recently reported. (Miller, R.C., Tu, C.W., Sputz, S.K., and Kopf, R.F., Appl. Phys. Lett. 49, 1245 (1986);Google Scholar
Tu, C.W., Miller, R.C., Wilson, B.A., Petroff, P.M., Harris, T.D., Kopf, R.F., Sputz, S.K., and Lamont, M.G., to be published in J. Crystal Growth and Wilson, B.A., Miller, R.C., Sputz, S.K., Harris, T.D., Sauer, R., Lamont, M.G., Tu, C.W., and Kopf, R.F., to be published in the Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on GaAs and Related Compounds, Las Vegas, 1986.)Google Scholar
8. Lee, T.C., Yen, M.Y., Chen, P., and Madhukar, A., Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Modulated Semiconductor Structures, Kyoto, Japan, 1985 (to appear in Surface Science).Google Scholar
9. Steiner, T., Thewalt, M.L.W., Koteles, E.S., and Salerno, J.P., Phys. Rev. B34, 1006 (1986).Google Scholar
10. Johnson, Lee, Koteles, Emil S., and Vassell, M.O., Phys. Rev. B33, 5512 (1986).Google Scholar
11. Morkoc, H., Witkowski, L.C., Drummond, T.J., Stanchak, C.M., Cho, A.Y., and Streetman, B.G., Electron. Lett. 16, 753 (1980).Google Scholar