Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T22:51:19.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Temperature Dependence of Damage in Boron-Implanted Silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

G. Ottaviani
Affiliation:
Physics Department, via Campi 213/A, 41100 Modena, Italy
F. Nava
Affiliation:
Physics Department, via Campi 213/A, 41100 Modena, Italy
R. Tonini
Affiliation:
Physics Department, via Campi 213/A, 41100 Modena, Italy
S. Frabboni
Affiliation:
Physics Department, via Campi 213/A, 41100 Modena, Italy
G. F. Cerofolini
Affiliation:
Enichem, via Medici del Vascello 26, 20138 Mileno, Italy
P. Cantoni
Affiliation:
INFN, via Irnerio 46, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Get access

Abstract

We have performed a systematic investigation of boron implantation at 30 keV into <100> n-type silicon in the 77 –300 K temperature range and mostly at 9×1015 cm−2 fluence. The analyses have been performed with ion channeling and cross sectional transmission electron microscopy both in as-implanted samples and in samples annealed in vacuum furnace at 500 °C and 850 °C for 30 min. We confirm the impossibility of amorphization at room temperature and the presence of residual damage mainly located at the boron projected range. On the contrary, a continuous amorphous layer can be obtained for implants at 77 K and 193 K; the thickness of the implanted layer is increased by lowering the temperature, at the same time the amorphous-crystalline interface becomes sharper. Sheet resistance measurements performed after isochronal annealing shows an apparent reverse annealing of the dopant only in the sample implanted at 273 K. The striking differences between light and heavy ions observed at room temperature implantation disappears at 77 K and full recovery with no residual damage of the amorphous layer is observed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Morehead, F.F. Jr. and Crowder, B.L., Radiat. Eff. 6, 27 (1970).Google Scholar
2. Armigliato, A., Nobili, D., Ostoja, P., Servidori, M. and Solmi, S., in Semiconductor Silicon 1977 (The Electrochem. Soc. Inc., Princeton, NJ 1977) p.638.Google Scholar
3. Michel, A.E., Kastl, R.H., Mader, S.R., Masters, B.J. and Gardner, J.A., Appl. Phys. Lett., 44, 404 (1984).Google Scholar
4. Davies, D.E., Appl. Phys. Lett., 14, 227 (1969).Google Scholar
5. Hart, R.R. and Marsh, O.J., Appl. Phys. Lett., 15, 206 (1969).Google Scholar
6. Huang, J., Fan, D. and Jaccodine, R.J., J. Appl. Phys., 63, 5521 (1988).Google Scholar
7. Chu, W.K., Mayer, J.W. and Nicolet, M.A., Backscattering Spectrometry, (Academic Press, New York, 1978).Google Scholar
8. Williams, J.S., Elliman, R.G., Brown, W.L. and Seidel, T.E., Phys. Rew. Lett., 55, 1482 (1985).Google Scholar
9. Cerofolini, G.F., Meda, L. and Volpones, C., J. Appl. Phys., 63, 4911 (1988).Google Scholar
10. Landi, E., Guimaraes, S. and Solmi, S., Appl. Phys.,A 44, 135 (1987).Google Scholar