Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:54:06.052Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Temperature and Field Dependence in Polymer Light Emitting Diodes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

L. D. Bozano ,
S.A. Carter ,
J.C. Scott ,
G.G. Malliaras  and
P.J. Brock
L. D. Bozano
Affiliation:
Physics Department, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064
S.A. Carter
Affiliation:
Physics Department, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA [email protected]
J.C. Scott
Affiliation:
IBM Almaden Research Center, San Jose, CA 95120
G.G. Malliaras
Affiliation:
Department of Material Science and Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
P.J. Brock
Affiliation:
IBM Almaden Research Center, San Jose, CA 95120
Get access

Abstract

We investigate the electrical properties of Polymer Light Emitting Diodes (LED's). The experimental data consists of steady state current-voltage characteristics and radiance as a function of temperature.

The basic LED structure is Anode/MEH-PPV (2-methoxy,5-(2'-ethyl-hexyloxy)-l,4-phenylene vinylene)/Cathode, with a polymer film 120-140 nm thick. We use different anode/cathode pairs to study transport and light emission properties. Measurements of external quantum efficiency of bipolar and monopolar devices are presented from 200 K to 300 K. The electron and hole mobilities are derived in the trap-free limit and at high voltages.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 558: Symposium B – Flat-Panel Displays and Sensors-Principles, Materials… , 1999 , 453
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Parker, I.D., J. Appl. Phys. 75, 1656 (1994).Google Scholar
2. Lampert, M.A. and Mark, P., Current Injection in Solids (Academic, New York, 1970).Google Scholar
3. Pai, D.M., J. Chem. Phys. 52, 2285 (1970).Google Scholar
4. Murgatroyd, P.N., J. Phys D 3, 151 (1970).Google Scholar
5. Greenham, N.C., PhD Thesis, Cambridge University 1995.Google Scholar
6. Bozano, L., Tuttle, S.E., Carter, S.A., and Brock, P.J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 3911 (1998).Google Scholar
7. Carter, S.A., Angelopoulos, M., Karg, S., Brock, P.J., and Scott, J.C., Appl. Phys. Lett 70, 2067 (1997).Google Scholar
8. Mallliaras, G.G., Salem, J.R., Brock, P.J., and Scott, J.C., J. Appl. Phys. 84, 1583 (1998).Google Scholar
9. Gill, W.D., J. Appl. Phys. 43, 5033 (1972).Google Scholar
10. Blom, P.W.M., Jong, M.J.M. de, and Munster, M.G. van, Phys. Rev. B. 55, 656 (1997).Google Scholar
11. Bailard, S. private communications.Google Scholar
12. Scott, J.C., Malliaras, G.G., Salem, J.R., Brock, P.J., Bozano, L., and Carter, S.A. in Injection, Transport and Recombination in Organic Light-Emitting Diodes (SPIE –Proc. 3476, San Diego, CA, 1998) pp.111–122.Google Scholar
13. Crone, B.K, Campbell, I.H., Davis, P.S., and Smith, D.L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 3162 (1998). At room temperature, for an electron dominated device (with a different anode), μo = 5 10−12 (cm2/Vs) instead of our 2 10−9 (cm2/Vs).Google Scholar