Hostname: page-component-669899f699-swprf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-26T00:00:44.537Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Tem Study of Step Morphology on the Non-Uhv Heat-Treated MgO (100) Surface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Simon King  and
C. Barry Carter
Simon King
Affiliation:
Dept. of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Amundson Hall, 421 Washington Ave. S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55455
C. Barry Carter
Affiliation:
Dept. of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Amundson Hall, 421 Washington Ave. S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55455
Get access

Abstract

Preliminary results from a study of the morphology of the MgO (100) surface after chemical etching followed by heat-treatment in air are presented. Contrast arising from the surface-steps so formed is found to be strongly dependent on the deviation parameter, suggesting that many of the step-faces are not perpendicular to the (100) foil plane but are, instead, often rather shallowly inclined.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 280: Symposium B – Evolution of Surface and Thin Film Microstructure , 1992 , 157
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Norton, M.G., Carter, C.B.; Scanning Microsc., 6, 385–398 (1992)Google Scholar
[2] Norton, M.G., Carter, C.B.; J. Mater. Res., 5, 2762–2765 (1990)Google Scholar
[3] Allard, L.F., Datye, A.K., Nolan, T.A., Mahan, S.L., Paine, R.T.; Ultramicrosc., 37, 153–168 (1991)Google Scholar
[4] Norton, M.G. Carter, C.B.; J. Cryst. Growth 110, 641–651 (1991)Google Scholar
[5] Moeckly, B.H. et al; Appl. Phys. Lett., 57, 1687–1689 (1990)Google Scholar
[6] Onishi, H., Egawa, C., Aruga, T., Iwasawa, Y.; Surface Science, 191, 479–491 (1987)Google Scholar
[7] Ferrer, S., Rojo, J.M., Salmeron, M., Somorjai, G.A.; Phil.Mag. A, 45, 261–269 (1982)Google Scholar
[8] Wang, Z.L., Bentley, J., Kenik, E.A., Horton, L.L., McKee, R.A.; Surface Science, 273, 88–108 (1992)Google Scholar
[9] Lehmpfuhl, G., Uchida, Y.; Ultramicroscopy, 4, 275–282 (1979)Google Scholar
[10] Tanji, T., Masaoka, H., Ito, J., Yada, K., Cowley, J.M.; Ultramicroscopy 27, 223–232 (1989)Google Scholar
[11] Norton, M.G., Summerfelt, S.R., Carter, C.B.; Appl. Phys. Lett, 56, 2246–2248 (1990)Google Scholar
[12] Anderson, I.M. - unpublished work.Google Scholar
[13] King, S.L., McKernan, S., Carter, C.B. - these proceedings.Google Scholar
[14] The authors acknowledge the support of die D.O.E. under grant # DE-FG02–89ER45381Google Scholar