Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:43:08.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A TEM Study of Dynamic Continuous Recrystallization in a Superplastic AL-4MG-0.3SC Alloy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

L.M. Dougherty
Affiliation:
Dept of Materials Science & Engineering, Univ of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL
I.M. Robertson
Affiliation:
Dept of Materials Science & Engineering, Univ of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL
J.S. Vetrano
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA
Get access

Abstract

An Al-4Mg-0.3Sc alloy, aged at 280°C for 8 hours and cold rolled to a 70% reduction, exhibited dynamic recrystallization during superplastic forming at 460°C and at a strain rate of 10−3sec−1. To understand the progression of recrystallization during forming, specimens were deformed under these same conditions to 0.1, 0.2, 0.4 and 0.8 true strain and studied postmortem using optical microscopy, transmission electron microscopy and orientation imaging microscopy. The microstructural evolution that occurred between each strain state was directly observed during deformation experiments at a nominal temperature of 460°C in the transmission electron microscope. These in-situ experiments showed the migration, coalescence, disintegration and annihilation of subboundaries. This combination of post-mortem analysis of specimens strained in bulk with real time observations made during these in-situ experiments allows the mechanisms operating during dynamic continuous recrystallization to be ascertained.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Diskin, A. M. and Alalykin, A. A., “Superplasticity of duralumin and magnalium type alloys with initial non-recrystallized structure,” Tsvetnye Metally (English translation), vol. 28, pp. 8688, 1987.Google Scholar
[2] Zhang, X. and Tan, M. J., “Dislocation model for continuous recrystallisation during initial stage of superplastic deformation,” Scripta Metallurgica et Materialia, vol. 38, pp. 827831, 1998.10.1016/S1359-6462(97)00535-6Google Scholar
[3] Hales, S. J. and McNelley, T. R., “Microstructural evolution by continuous recrystallization in a superplastic Al-Mg alloy,” Acta Metallurgica et Materialia, vol. 36, pp. 12291239, 1988.10.1016/0001-6160(88)90275-1Google Scholar
[4] Weinburg, F., “Grain Boundary Shear in Aluminum,” Transactions of the Metallurgical Society of AIME, vol. 212, pp. 808817, 1958.Google Scholar
[5] Hales, S. J., McNelley, T. R., and McQueen, H. J., “Recrystallization and superplasticity at 300°C in an Al-Mg alloy,” Metallurgical Transactions A, vol. 22, pp. 10371047, 1991.10.1007/BF02661097Google Scholar