Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:02:49.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tem Studies on the Morphology, Size Distribution and Structure of Nanocrystalline Iron Particles Using a Formvar Embedded Preparation Technique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Hengfei Ni
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky, Center for Applied Energy Research, Lexington, KY 40511-8433
Xiangxin Bi
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky, Center for Applied Energy Research, Lexington, KY 40511-8433
John M. Stencel
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky, Center for Applied Energy Research, Lexington, KY 40511-8433
Get access

Abstract

A new, simple and effective method was developed for preparing specimens of Fecarbide ultrafine particles (UFP), by suspending them in Formvar films. Various samples of Fe-carbide UFP's were obtained by a laser pyrolysis process by varying the process parameters. The UFP samples were mixed with different concentrations of Formvar in ethylene dichloride solution. The sample particles were embedded in ultra-thin Formvar films with thickness of 20 nm or more and mounted on the 200 mesh copper TEM grids. The influences of the concentration of the Formvar solution and the amount of sample powder on the UFP distribution in the micrographs were investigated to determine the optimal film-making parameters. The different sizes and same spherical morphology for the various UFP samples were revealed, indicating the main diameters to be between 5–20 nm. Compared with the size values obtained by using XRD, the UFP size measurements by the new process are in good agreement. The crystalline features and the surface of the UFP's are presented and confirmed by micro-diffraction studies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Hayashi, C., Physics Today, 12, 44 (1987).Google Scholar
2. Buckle, E. R., Tsakiropoulos, P., and Poiton, K. C., International Metals Reviews, 31 (6), 258 (1986).Google Scholar
3. Sato, T., Iijima, T., Seki, M. and Inagaki, N., J. of Mag. Mater. 65, 252 (1986).Google Scholar
4. Derbyshire, F. J., Davis, B. H., Eklund, P. C., Keogh, R., Stencel, J. M. and Thwaites, M., Proc. Symp. S. Mater. Res. Soc. Mtg., 171 (1990).Google Scholar
5. Eklund, P. C., Stencel, J. M., Bi, X. X., Keogh, R. A. and Derbyshire, F. J., Preprints, ACS Mtg., Fuel Chemistry Div., 36 (2), 551 (1991).Google Scholar
6. Girardin, D. and Maurer, M., Mat. Res. Bull. 25, 119 (1990).Google Scholar
7. Matyi, R. J., Schwartz, L. H. and Butt, J. B., Cat. Rew.-Sci. Eng. 29 (1), 41 (1991).Google Scholar
8. Morra, M. M. and Biederman, R. R., Mater. Sci. and Eng., A124, 55 (1990).Google Scholar
9. Seki, M., Sato, T. and Usui, S.,J. Appl. Phys., 63 (5), 1424 (1988).Google Scholar
10. Srinivasan, R., Keogh, R. A. and Davis, B. H., Preprints, ACS Mtg., Fuel Chemistry Div., 38 (1), 203 (1993).Google Scholar
11. Iijima, S. and Ichihashi, T., Phys. Rew. Left., 56 (6), 616 (1986).Google Scholar
12. Smith, D. J., Petford-Long, A. K., Wallenberg, L. R. and Bovin, J.-O., Science, 233, 872 (1986).Google Scholar
13. Stencel, J. M., Eklund, P. C., Bi, X-X. and Derbyshire, F. J., Catalysis Today, 15, 285 (1992).Google Scholar
14. Bi, X-X., Ganguly, B., Huffman, G. P., Huggins, F. E., Endo, M. and Eklund, P. C., J. Mater. Res. 8 (7), 1666 (1993).Google Scholar
15. Dundurs, J., Marks, L. D. and Ajayan, P. M., Phil. Mag., A57, 605 (1988).Google Scholar
16. Jose-Yacaman, M. and Avalos-Borja, M., Catal. Rev.-Sci. Eng. 34 (1&2), 55 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Niklasson, G. A., Torebring, A., Larsson, C., Grangvist, C. G. and Farestam, T., Phys. Rev. Lett., 60 (17), 1735 (1988).Google Scholar