Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-495rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T12:26:31.833Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Technique to Measure Thermodynamic Adhesion of Copper-Polyimide Interfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Marlon E. Menezes ,
I.M. Roberton  and
H.K. Birnbaum
Marlon E. Menezes
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1304 W. Green St., Urbana, II. 61801.
I.M. Roberton
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1304 W. Green St., Urbana, II. 61801.
H.K. Birnbaum
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1304 W. Green St., Urbana, II. 61801.
Get access

Abstract

A contact angle measurement technique has been used to determine the thermodynamic adhesive strength between nano-sized copper clusters and polyimide. The copper clusters are formed under UHV conditions by using ∼ mono-layer per minute deposition rates to assist equilibrium cluster formation. Temperatures of the polyimide substrate during the deposition process are maintained below Tg, which ensures no diffusion of the copper atoms into the polyimide matrix. Values of the strength of adhesion from these contact angle measurements are in reasonable agreement with predictions made using Fowkes’ theory of non-polar interfacial adhesion, but are at least one order of magnitude less than the value obtained by mechanical tests. The limitations of this technique due to deformation at the polyimide surface, as well as kinetic factors constraining equilibrium cluster formation will be discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 445: Electronic Packaging Materials Science IX , 1996 , 257
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Li, Jian, Seidel, Tom E. and Mayer, Jim W., MRS Bulletin, 19 (8), 15, (1994).Google Scholar
2 Reichmanis, E. and Wilkins, C.W. in “Microelectronic Polymers”, edited by Htoo, M.S., (Marcell Decker, New York, 1989), p.1.Google Scholar
3 DiNardo, N.J. in “Metallized Plastics I ”, edited by Mittal, K.L. and Susko., J.R., (Plenum Press, New York, 1989), p. 137.Google Scholar
4 Lieng-Huang, Lee (ed.), Fundamentals of Adhesion, (Plenum Press, New York, 1991).Google Scholar
5 Tyson, W.R., Canadian etallurgical Quarterly, 14(4), 307, (1975).Google Scholar
6 Wu, Souheng in “Polymer Handbook”, edited by Brandrup, J. and Immergut, E.H., (3 rd edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1989), p. VI–411.Google Scholar
7 Fowkes, Frederick, Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 64, 561, (1960).Google Scholar
8 Peddeda, R., Preparation and Characterization of Metal/Sapphire and Metal/Polyimide Thin-Film Laminates, Ph.D. Thesis, (Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois, 1991).Google Scholar
9 Faupel, F., Yang, C.H., Chen, S.T. and Ho, P.S., J. Applied Phyics, 65 (5), 1917, (1989).Google Scholar
10 Aravas, N., Kim, K.S. and Loukis, M.J., Materials Science and Engineering, A107, 159, (1989).Google Scholar
11 Menezes, Marlon, Robertson, I.M. and Birnbaum, H.K., Novel technique to improve adhesion between metal-polymer interfaces, see proceedings of this symposium.Google Scholar