Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:44:55.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

TCAD Modeling and Simulation of Sub-100nm Gate Length Silicon and GaN based SOI MOSFETs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Lei Ma
Affiliation:
[email protected], North Carolina State University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 327 Monteith, Campus BOX 7911, Raleigh, NC, 27695, United States, 919-3898481
Yawei Jin
Affiliation:
[email protected], North Carolina State University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Raleigh, NC, 27695, United States
Chang Zeng
Affiliation:
[email protected], North Carolina State University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Raleigh, NC, 27695, United States
Krishnanshu Dandu
Affiliation:
[email protected], North Carolina State University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Raleigh, NC, 27695, United States
Mark Johnson
Affiliation:
[email protected], North Carolina State University, Department of Material Science and Engineering, Raleigh, NC, 27695, United States
Doug William Barlage
Affiliation:
[email protected], North Carolina State University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Raleigh, NC, 27695, United States
Get access

Abstract

Sub-100nm gate length silicon and GaN based SOI n-type MOSFET are modeled and simulated using ISE-TCAD (now synopsys_sentaurus). Several silicon SOI structures such as planar fully depleted SOI, FinFET, Tri-Gate MOSFET, cylindrical channel (OMFET) and triangular channel MOSFETs have been studied to compare the structure dependence of the device performance. Silicon and GaN as channel materials are also compared for these different SOI structures for projecting the device performance for very short channel SOI MOSFETs. Our study shows that for sub-100nm gate length, GaN based transistors have better Ion/Ioff ratio and higher small signal transconductance than silicon based transistors. And GaN and Si based devices have comparable performance such as sub-threshold slope and threshold roll off, etc. However for sub 20nm gate length, simulation shows that while it is not satisfying for silicon based device for digital applications, GaN based transistors with lower off state leakage current, less short channel effect than Silicon based transistors are still good candidates for digital applications . The TCAD study shows that GaN could be a promising candidate for making very short channel device as the GaN processing technology is advancing.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Wong, H.-S.P., Chan, K.K., and Taur, Y., IEDM Tech. Dig., 1977 pp. 427430.Google Scholar
2 Hisamoto, D., Lee, W.-C., Kedzierski, J., Takeuchi, H., Asano, K., Kuo, C., Anderson, R., King, T.-J., Bokor, J., and Hu, C., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 47, pp23202325, Dec. 2000.Google Scholar
3 Doyle, B. S., Boyanov, B., Datta, S., Doczy, M., Hareland, S., Jin, B., Kavalieros, J., Linton, T., Rios, R., and Chau, R., VLSI Technology, 2003. Digest of Technical Papers. 2003 Symposium on, 10-12 June 2003, Pages:133134.Google Scholar
4 Doyle, B. S., Datta, S., Doczy, M., Hareland, S., Jin, B., Kavalieros, J., Linton, T., Murthy, A., Rios, R., and Chau, R., IEEE Lett. Electron Devices, vol. 24, No. 4, pp263265, April. 2003.Google Scholar
5 Takato, H., Sunouchi, K., Okabe, N., Nitayama, A., Hieda, K., Horiguchi, F., and Masuoka, F., IEDM Tech. Dig., 1988, pp.222225.Google Scholar
6 Miyano, S., Hirose, M., and Masuoka, F., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 18761881, Aug. 1992.Google Scholar
7 Khan, M. Asif, Hu, X., Sumin, G., Lunev, A., Yang, J., Gaska, R., and Shur, M. S., IEEE Lett. Electron Devices, vol. 21, No. 2, pp6365, Feb. 2000.Google Scholar
8 Matocha, K., Chow, T. P., and Gutmann, R. J., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 52, No. 1, pp610, Jan. 2005.Google Scholar
9 Ren, F., Kuo, J. M., Hong, M., Hobson, W. S., Lothian, J. R., Lin, J., Tsai, H. S., Mannaerts, J. P., Kwo, J., Chu, S. N.G., Chen, Y. K., and Cho, A. Y., IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol 19, No.8, Aug. 1998.Google Scholar