Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T09:02:03.495Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tantalum and Tantalum Nitride as Diffusion Barriers Between Copper and Silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Karen Holloway
Affiliation:
T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598
Peter Fryer
Affiliation:
T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598
Get access

Abstract

We have investigated the effectiveness of thin tantalum layers as diffusion barriers to copper. Fifty nm Ta films were sputtered onto unpatterned single crystal Si wafers and overlaid with 100 nm Cu. Material reactions in these films were followed as a function of annealing temperature by in-situ resistance measurements, and characterized by by Rutherford Backscattering and cross-section TEM. The effect of the incorporation of nitrogen was explored by reactively depositing Ta(5 at.% N) and Ta2N. Pure Ta prevents Cu - silicon interaction to at least 600 °C. At higher temperatures, reaction of the Si substrate with Ta forms a planar TaSi2 layer. Cu rapidly penetrates to the Si substrate, forming Cu silicide precipitates at the TaSi2 - Si interface. A study performed on the Si/Ta(N)/Cu film had very similar results. Ta2N is an even more effective barrier to copper penetration, preventing Cu reaction with the substrate for temperatures up to at least 700 °C.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Farahani, M.M., Turner, T.E., and Barnes, J.J., J. Electrochem. Soc. 136, 1484 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Hornstrom, S.E., Charai, A., Thomas, O., Krusin-Elbaum, L., Fryer, P.M., Harper, J.M.E., Gong, S. and Robertsson, A., Surface and Interface Anal. 14, 7 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Kattelus, H.P., Kolawa, E., Affolter, K., and Nicolet, M-A., J. Vac. Sci. Tecnhol. A3, 2246 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Weber, E.R., Appl. Phys. A, 1 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Hu, C-K., Chang, S., Small, M.B., and Lewis, J.E., in Proceedings of the Third International VLSI Multilevel Interconnection Conference, June 9, 1986, Santa Clara, CA.Google Scholar
6. Spit, H.M., Gupta, D., Tu, K.N., and Hu, C-K., private communication.Google Scholar
7. Toth, L.E., in Transition Metal Carbides and Nitrides, Academic Press, New York, 1971.Google Scholar
8. Farroq, M.A., Murarka, S.P., Chang, C.C., and Baiocchi, F.A., J. Appl. Phys. 65, 3017 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Stolt, L. and d’Heurle, F.M., to be published.Google Scholar
10. Aboelfotoh, M.O., Cros, A., Svensson, B.G., and Tu, K.N., to be published.Google Scholar
11. Chambers, S.A. and Weaver, J.H., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A3, 1929 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Bravman, J. and Sinclair, R., J. Electron Microsc. Tech. 1, 53 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Solberg, J.K., Acta Cryst. A34, 684 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Ward, W.J. and Carroll, K.M., J. Electrochem. Soc. 129, 227 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Mundschau, M., Bauer, E., Telieps, W., and Swiech, W., J. Appl. Phys. 65, 4747 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Harper, J.M.E., Charai, A., Stolt, L., d’Heurle, F.M., and Fryer, P.M., to be published.Google Scholar
17. Holloway, K., Ransom, C., Colgan, E., Gambino, J., Fryer, P., and Schad, R., to be published.Google Scholar
18. Holloway, K., Cabral, C., Fryer, P., unpublished.Google Scholar