Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T06:56:51.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Synthetic Helical Polymers and Diblock Copolymers: Building Blocks for Biocompatible/Biofunctional Helical Superstructures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2012

Biswajit Sannigrahi
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Center for Functional Nanoscale Materials, Clark Atlanta University, Atlanta, GA 30314, U.S.A.
Juana Mendenhall
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Center for Functional Nanoscale Materials, Clark Atlanta University, Atlanta, GA 30314, U.S.A. Current Address: Department of Chemistry, Morehouse College, Atlanta, GA 30314, U.S.A.
Ishrat M Khan
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Center for Functional Nanoscale Materials, Clark Atlanta University, Atlanta, GA 30314, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Bottom-up design of materials via self-assembly with appropriate building blocks offers the possibility of developing innovative three-dimensional all synthetic materials with new functionalities. Helical optically active poly(3-methyl-4-vinylpyridine)/(R) and (S) mandelic acid and helical optically active poly(3-methyl-4-vinylpyridine) (P3M4VP)/ D- and L- amino acid complexes have been prepared. A diblock copolymer of helical poly[(3-methyl-4-vinylprydine)/mandelic acid complex]-block-poly(styrene) has been processed into smectic layer-like helical-bundle structures on silicon wafer. Additionally, optically active helical poly(2-methoxystyrene) (P2PMS) has been synthesized and the surfaces of the chiral helical P2MS have been shown to be effective as supports for mouse and human osteoblast cells. The cell attachment and growth data demonstrate that the chiral P2MS surfaces were better supports compared to achiral P2MS surfaces.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Phillip, D. and Stoddart, J.F., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl 35, 1154 (1996).Google Scholar
2. Nakano, T. and Okamoto, Y., Chem. Rev. 101, 4013 (2001).Google Scholar
3. Whitesides, G.M., Science 295, 2418 (2002).Google Scholar
4. Zhang, X., Shaen, Z., Feng, C., Yang, D., Li, Y., Hu, J., Lu, G., and Huang, X., Macromolecules 42, 4249 (2009).Google Scholar
5. Eisenberg, A. and Yu, K., Macromolecules 31, 3509 (1998).Google Scholar
6. Nolte, R.M., Sommerdijk, N.A.J.M., Fischer, M., and Cornelissen, J.L.M., Science 280, 1427 (1998).Google Scholar
7. Ortiz, L.J. and Khan, I.M., Macromolecules 31, 5927 (1998).Google Scholar
8. Sannigrahi, B., McGeady, P.M. and Khan, I.M., Macromolecular Bioscience 4, 999 (2004).Google Scholar
9. Ortiz, L.J., Pratt, L., Smitherman, K., Sannigrahi, B. and Khan, I.M., ACS Symposium Series, 812, 55 (2002).Google Scholar
10. Gordon, K., Sannigrahi, B., McGeady, P., Wang, X.Q., Mendenhall, J. and Khan, I.M., Journal Biomaterials Science, 20, 2055 (2009).Google Scholar