Hostname: page-component-669899f699-8p65j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-29T19:37:03.433Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Synthesis of Inorganic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Polymers on Metal Surfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Dale L. Perry ,
Crystal Lewis  and
Mishi Pugh
Dale L. Perry
Affiliation:
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720.
Crystal Lewis
Affiliation:
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720.
Mishi Pugh
Affiliation:
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720.
Get access

Abstract

Films of copper(II) imidazolate, an aromatic, heterocyclic hydrocarbon polymer, have been synthesized in situ at room temperature on copper surfaces. The films were made using a copper(II) salt formed as a thin film on an metallic copper substrate with subsequent complexation and deprotonation of the imidazole molecule. The in-situ formed copper(II) imidazolate polymer films have been studied by elemental analyses, scanning electron microscopy, and x-ray photoelectron and Auger spectroscopy. The copper Auger parameter has been derived for the films.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 453: Symposium R – Solid State Chemistry of Inorganic Materials , 1996 , 733
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Eilbeck, W. J., Holmes, F., and Underhill, A. E., J. Chem. Soc. A 757(1967).Google Scholar
2. Chiswell, B., Lions, F., and Ghosh, B. S., Inorg. Chem. 3, 110(1964).Google Scholar
3. Goodgame, M. and Cotton, F. A., J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 84, 1543(1962).Google Scholar
4. Sundberg, R. J. and Martin, R. B., Chem. Rev. 74, 471(1974).Google Scholar
5. Bauman, J. E. Jr, and Wang, J. C., Inorg. Chem. 3, 368(1964).Google Scholar
6. Jarvis, J. A. J., and Wells, A. F., Acta Gryst. 13, 1027(1960).Google Scholar
7. Xue, Q., Liu, S.-Y., Huang, X.-Y., Sun, B., Zhang, P.-X., Li, X.-Y., and Guo, W.-L., Chinese Sci. Bull. 34, 1090(1989).Google Scholar
8. Schon, G., Surf. Sci. 35, 96(1973).Google Scholar
9. Gaarenstroom, S. W. and Winograd, N., J. Chem. Phys. 67, 3500(1977).Google Scholar
10. Mclniyre, N. S., Rummery, T. E., Cook, M. G., and Owen, D., J. Electrochem. Soc. 123 1165(1976).Google Scholar
11. Wagner, C.D. and Joshi, A., J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 47, 283(1988).Google Scholar