Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:12:37.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Surface Roughness Investigation of Thin SiO2 Films Deposited from N2O and SiH4

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

V.H.C. Watt
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis, CA 95616
M. Moinpour
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis, CA 95616
R. Sadjad
Affiliation:
Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA 95052
W. Lu
Affiliation:
Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA 95052
G. Neubauer
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis, CA 95616
R. Bower
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis, CA 95616
Get access

Abstract

The surface roughness of deposited SiO2 has become increasingly important as integrated circuit (IC's) device dimensions approach the low sub-micron regime. The impact of roughness is consistent with that of gross paniculate contamination such that both contribute to device failure and low yield. SiO2 deposited from nitrous oxide (N2O) and silane (SiH4) addresses other stringent process requirement such as conformity and step coverage but, certain process conditions result in rough surface textures. For this study SiO2 was deposited at a pressure of 400 mTorr and at a temperature of 800°C in a vertical diffusion furnace (VDF) from SiH4 and N2O. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) was used to investigate the film's surfaces for roughness. We have found that the surface roughness is a strong function of deposition pressure, total gas flow, and N2O/SiH4 flow ratio. In this paper, film roughness is presented as measured by the AFM and laser-based particle detector. The possible impact of roughness on device failure and hence low yield is also investigated.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Watt, V. H. C., Nakatani, D., Moinpour, M., Hwang, D., and Lu, W., in the Proc. of the 3rdsymp. on silicon nitride and silicon dioxide thin insulating films, the ECS, inc., Vol. 94–16, pp. 328 - 337, San Fracisco, CA, May 1994.Google Scholar
2. Lean, A. J., and Jackson, R. B., J. Electrochem. Soc., Vol. 132 –12, pp. 29752980 Dec. 1985.Google Scholar
3. Yasutake, M., Wakiyama, S., and Kato, Y., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 12(3), pp. 15721576, May/Jun 1994.Google Scholar
4. Kwok, K., Yieh, E., Robles, S., and Nguyen, B. C., J. Electrochem. Soc., Vol. 141–8, pp. 21722177, Aug. 1994.Google Scholar
5. Crowder, S. W., Griffin, P. B., and Plummer, J. D., Appl. Phys. Lett., 65(13), pp. 1698 -1699, Sept. 1994.Google Scholar
6. Rojhantalab, H., Moinpour, M., Peter, N., Dass, M. L. A., Hough, W., Natter, R., and Moghadam, F., in the Proc. on Evolution of Surface and Thin Film Microstructure, the Mat. Res. Soc., Vol. 280, pp. 147 - 151, 1993.Google Scholar
7. Dass, M. L. A., Moinpour, M., and Moghadam, F., Proc. Microcontamination Conf. pp. 801813, 1993.Google Scholar
8. Li, J., Moinpour, M., Fardi, B., Thach, D., Dass, M. L. A., and Moghadam, F., in the Proc. of the Symp. on Contamination Control and defect reduction in Semiconductor Manufacturing III, the ECS, inc., vol. 94–9, pp. 3139, CA, May 1994.Google Scholar
9. Morrison, T., Tripathi, S., and Moghadam, F., in the Proc. of the symp. on contamination control and defect reduction in semiconductor manufacturing III, the ECS, inc., Vol. 94–9, p. 131140, CA, May 1994.Google Scholar