Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:30:11.774Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Surface Reactivity of Silicon and Germanium in CF4 -O2 Reactive Ion Etching

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

Christophe Cardinaud
Affiliation:
Laboratoire des Plasmas et des Couches Minces I.M.N. UMR 110 CNRS 2 rue de la Houssinière 44072 NANTES Cedex 03, France
A. Campo
Affiliation:
Laboratoire des Plasmas et des Couches Minces I.M.N. UMR 110 CNRS 2 rue de la Houssinière 44072 NANTES Cedex 03, France
G. Turban
Affiliation:
Laboratoire des Plasmas et des Couches Minces I.M.N. UMR 110 CNRS 2 rue de la Houssinière 44072 NANTES Cedex 03, France
Get access

Abstract

Reactive ion etching of silicon and germanium in CF4 -O2 was investigated. Above 20% O2 germanium etching is selective with respect to silicon. In agreement with the evolution of the fluorine and oxygen concentration in the plasma and of the etch products formation rate, surface analysis reveals that the growth of a SiOxFy layer slows down the silicon etching whereas the formation of GeOxFy does not inhibit germanium etching. Using a simple kinetic model, the silicon and germanium reactivity and its dependency with respect to the plasma composition are expressed in function of the experimental data. Results suggest that surface composition controls silicon etching, whereas germanium etching depends only on the fluorine flux on the surface.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Oehrlein, G.S., Bestwick, T.D., Jones, O.L., Jaso, M.A., Lindström, J.L., J. Electrochem. Soc. 138, 1443 (1991).Google Scholar
2. Oehrlein, G.S., Kroesen, G.M.W., Frésart, E. de, Zhang, Y., Bestwick, T.D., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A9, 768 (1991).Google Scholar
3. Cardinaud, Ch., Campo, A., Turban, G., Proc. 11th Int. Symp. Plasma Chem. 903 (1993).Google Scholar
4. Mogab, C.J., Adams, A.C., Flamm, D.L., J. Appl. Phys. 49, 3796 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar