Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T18:09:20.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Surface Modification of Nanocrystals for Biological and Environmental Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Chunjiao Zhou
Affiliation:
[email protected], hunan university, changsha, China
Pengfei Rong
Affiliation:
[email protected], Central South University, The Radiological Department Of Third Xiang-Ya Hospital, changsha, China
Wei Wang
Affiliation:
[email protected], Central South University, changsha, China
Wenjie Zhang
Affiliation:
[email protected], Hunan university, changsha, China
Qiang Wan
Affiliation:
[email protected], Hunan university, changsha, China
Bingsuo Zou
Affiliation:
Get access

Abstract

Superparamagnetic nanoparticles can find many applications in different fields with greener techniques. The Fe3O4 nanoparticles less than 10nm coated with humic acid were synthesized by a chemical co-precipitation technique with cheap and environmental friendly iron salts and humic acid. The as-synthesized products were highly soluble in water. The efficacy for liver Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agent was investigated by using it to the live rat and tumor-bearing rabbit models, on a conventional clinical 1.5 T MRI facility. Moreover the Fe3O4 –HA composite used in the Methylene Blue adsorption in neutral aqueous solution was studied too with high efficiency. The experimental results showed that the humic acid coated Fe3O4 superparamagnetic nanoparticles were suitalbe not only for liver MRI contrast agent, but also as adsorbents for removal of cationic organic dyes from neutral water.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Herdt, A. R. Kim, B. S.and Taton, T. A. Bioconjugate Chem. 18, 183189 (2007).Google Scholar
2 Kouassi, G. K. and Irudayaraj, J. Anal. Chem. 78, 3234 (2006).Google Scholar
3 Gao, L. Z. Zhuang, J. Nie, L. Zhang, J. B. Zhang, Y. Gu, N. Wang, T. H. Feng, J. Yang, D. L. Perrett, S. and Yan, X. Y. Nature nanotechnology 2, 577 (2007).Google Scholar
4 Lutz, J. F. Stiller, S. Hoth, A. Kaufner, L. Pison, U. and Cartier, R. Biomacromolecules 7, 3132 (2006).Google Scholar
5 Yang, J. Lee, T. Lee, J. Lim, E. K. Hyung, W. Lee, C. H. Song, Y. J. Suh, J. S. Yoon, H. G. Huh, Y. M. and Haam, S. Chem. Mater. 19, 3870 (2007).Google Scholar
6 Liu, J. F. Zhao, Z. S. and Jiang, G. B. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 6949 (2008).Google Scholar
7 White, B. R. Stackhouse, B. T. and Holcombe, J. A. J. Hazard. Mater. 161, 848 (2009).Google Scholar
8 Li, W. Fraser, S. E. and Meade, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 1413 (1999).Google Scholar
9 Sun, C. Sze, R. and Zhang, M. J. Biomedical Mater. Res. Part A 78, 550 (2006).Google Scholar
10 Leuschner, C. Kumar, C. S. Hansel, W. Soboyejo, W. Zhou, J. and Hormes, J. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 99, 163 (2006).Google Scholar
11 Li, Z. Tan, B. E. Allix, M. Cooper, A. I. and Rosseinsky, M. J. Small 4, 231(2008).Google Scholar