Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T15:21:31.339Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Superhydrophobic Nanocrystalline Nickel Films Inspired by Lotus Leaf

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

Mehdi Shafiei
Affiliation:
Mechanical, Automotive and Materials Engineering, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON N9b3P4, Canada
Ahmet T. Alpas
Affiliation:
Mechanical, Automotive and Materials Engineering, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON N9b3P4, Canada
Get access

Abstract

A new method to fabricate superhydrophobic hard films is described. Surface texture of lotus leaf was replicated on an acetate film, on which a nanocrystalline (NC) Ni coating with a grain size of 30 ± 4 nm and a hardness of 4.42 GPa was electrodeposited. The surface texture consisted of conical protuberances with a height of 10.0 ± 2.0 0m and a tip radius of 2.5 ± 0.5 0m. An additional electrodeposition for 120 s and 300 s was used to locally modify the surface structure by depositing ‘Ni crowns' on the protuberances that increased their height to 14.0 ± 2.0 0m and their tip radius to 6.0 ± 0.5 0m. The modified structures were then treated with a perfluoropolyether (PFPE) solution, which provided a high water contact angle of 156°, i.e., comparable to the naturally superhydrophobic lotus leaf. The increased hydrophobicity as a result of surface structure and chemistry modifications was evident compared to a smooth NC Ni sample, which had a contact angle of 64°.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Kushmerick, J.G., Hankins, M.G., Boer, M.P. de, Clews, P.J., Carpick, R.W. and Bunker, B.C., Tribol. Lett. 10, 103 (2001).Google Scholar
2. Wenzel, R.N., Ind. Eng. Chem. 28, 988 (1936).Google Scholar
3. Adamson, A.W. and Gast, A.P., Physical Chemistry of Surfaces (Wiley, New York, 1997) p. 353.Google Scholar
4. Tuteja, A., Choi, W., McKinley, G.H., Cohen, R.E. and Rubner, M.F., MRS Bull. 33, 752 (2008).Google Scholar
5. Cassie, A.B.D. and Baxter, S., Trans. Faraday Soc. 3, 16 (1944).Google Scholar
6. He, B., Chen, W. and Wang, Q., in Proc. Int. Joint Tribol. Conf., San Antonio, TX, 2006.Google Scholar
7. Singh, R.A., Yoon, E., Kim, H.J., Kim, J., Jeong, H.E. and Suh, K.Y., Mater. Sci. Eng. C27, 875 (2007).Google Scholar
8. Burton, Z. and Bhushan, B., Nano Lett. 5, 1607 (2005).Google Scholar
9. Shafiei, M. and Alpas, A.T., Mater. Sci. Eng. C28, 1340 (2008).Google Scholar
10. Neinhuis, C. and Barthlott, W., Ann. Botany 79, 667 (1997).Google Scholar
11. Barthlott, W. and Neinhuis, C., Planta 202, 1 (1997).Google Scholar
12. Cheng, Y.T., Rodak, D.E., Wong, C.E. and Hayden, C.A., Nanotechnology 17, 1359 (2006).Google Scholar
13. Gu, G., Shen, X. and Qing, F., App. Surf. Sci. 253, 6980 (2007).Google Scholar