Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:37:41.357Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Subcritical Debonding of Multilayer Interconnect Structures: Temperature and Humidity Effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Michael Lane
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University
Reiner Dauskardt
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University
Qing Ma
Affiliation:
Intel Corp., Santa Clara, CA
Harry Fujimoto
Affiliation:
Intel Corp., Santa Clara, CA
Nety Krishna
Affiliation:
Applied Materials, Santa Clara, CA
Get access

Abstract

Thin film structures may fail by progressive or time-dependent debonding at stresses far below those required for catastrophic failure. Previous work has shown that progressive debonding in a typical interconnect structure occurs either along the TiN/SiO2 interface or parallel to this interface in the SiO2 Such subcritical debonding was found to span several orders of magnitude of debond growth rates and occur at significantly reduced driving forces. The presence of SiO2 at the failure location indicates that the mechanisms which give rise to stress corrosion cracking in bulk glasses may also play a role in the subcritical debonding behavior of multilayer interconnect structures. Accordingly, this work focuses on the effects of temperature and humidity on subcritical debonding and rationalizes them in terms of the relevant chemical reactions taking place at the debond tip.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Wiederhorn, S.M., “Influence of Water Vapor on Crack Propagation in Soda-Lime Glass,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 1967, 50, 407–15.Google Scholar
2. Lawn, B. R., “An Atomistic Model of Kinetic Crack Growth in Brittle Solids,” J. Mats. Sci., 1975, 10, 469480.Google Scholar
3. Cook, R. and Liniger, E., “Kinetics of Indentation Cracking in Glass,” J. AM Ceram. Soc. 76 [5] 1096–105 (1993).Google Scholar
4. Dauskardt, R. H., Lane, M., Ma, Q. and Krishna, N., “Adhesion and Debonding of Multi-Layer Thin Film Structures,” Eng. Fract. Mech. 1998, 61, 141–62.Google Scholar
5. Lane, M., Dauskardt, R. H., Ware, R., Ma, Q. and Fujimoto, H., “Progressive Debonding of Mulit-Layer Interconnect Structures,” Proceedings of the 1997 MRS Spring Symposium, San Francisco. CA. Materials Reliability in Microelectronics VII, v 473, 21–6.Google Scholar
6. Ma, Q., Bumgarner, J., Fujimoto, H., Lane, M. and Dauskardt, R. H., “Adhesion Measurement of Interfaces in Multilayer Interconnect Structures,” in Proc. MRS Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 1997 Materials Reliability in Microelectronics VII, p. 314.Google Scholar
7. Lane, M., Dauskardt, R. H., Krishna, N. and Hashim, I., “Effect of Nitrogen Content on Interfacial Adhesion of the Ta/SiC2 Interface,” submitted Proceedings of the 1999 MRS Spring Symposium, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
8. Bhatnagar, A., Hoffman, M. J., Dauskardt, R. H., “The Effect of Environment on Subcritical Crack-Growth Behavior in Y-Si-Al-O-N Glasses,” submitted to Amer. Cerm. Soc.Google Scholar
9. Lane, M. and R. H. Dauskardt unpublished analysis.Google Scholar