Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:16:24.130Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studying Actinide Correlations in Solution using High-Energy X-ray Scattering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

S. Skanthakumar
Affiliation:
[email protected], Argonne Natinal Laboratory, Chemistry Division, BLDG 200/M153, Argonne, Illinois, 60439, United States, (630) 252-1754, (630) 252-4225
L. Soderholm
Affiliation:
[email protected], Argonne Natinal Laboratory, Chemistry Division, United States
Get access

Abstract

High energy x-ray scattering (HEXS) is becoming a valuable tool for quantifying actinide coordination environments in solution. The technique is described with and exemplified by a study on Th speciation. A comparison of data from two samples with pHs of 0 and 3.4 show differences in the Th structural environment that can be attributed to Th colloid formation at the higher pH. A further comparison of the HEXS data from the colloidal sample with Th L3-edge EXAFS data on the same sample clearly demonstrates the advantage of the scattering data when looking for correlations at second-near neighbor or longer distances.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Katz, J.J., Seaborg, G.T., and Morss, L.R., eds. The Chemistry of the Actinide Elements. Second ed. 1986, Chapman and Hall: London. 1674.Google Scholar
2. Antonio, M.R. and Soderholm, L., X-ray absorption spectroscopy of the actinides, in Chemistry of the Actinide and Transactinide Elements, J.J. Katz, L.R. Morss, J. Fuger, and N. Edelstein, Editors. in press, Kluwer.Google Scholar
3. Teo, B.K., EXAFS: Basic Principles and Data Analysis. 1986, Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 349.Google Scholar
4. Aberg, M., Ferri, D., Glaser, J., and Grenthe, I., Inorg. Chem. 22, 3986 (1983)Google Scholar
5. Magini, M., Licheri, G., Paschina, G., Piccaluga, G., and Pinna, G., X-002D;ray diffraction of ions in aqueous solutions: hydration and complex formation. 1988, Boca Raton: CRC Press Inc. 267 Google Scholar
6. Johansson, G., Acta Chem. Scand. 43, 307 (1989)Google Scholar
7. Baes, C.E. and Mesmer, R.F., The Hydrolysis of Cations. 1976, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
8. Neck, V. and Kim, J.I., Radiochim. Acta. 89, 1 (2001)Google Scholar
9. Rutt, U., Beno, M.A., Strempfer, J., Jennings, G., Kurtz, C., and Montano, P.A., Nucl.Instrum. Meth. A. 467, 1026 (2001)Google Scholar
10. Skanthakumar, S., Antonio, M.R., and Soderholm, L., Inorg. Chem., (submitted)Google Scholar
11. Soderholm, L., Skanthakumar, S., and Neuefeind, J., Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 383, 48 (2005)Google Scholar
12. Whitfield, H.J., Roman, D., and Palmer, A.R., J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 28, 2817 (1966)Google Scholar
13. Moll, H., Denecke, M.A., Jalilehvand, F., Sandstrom, M., and Grenthe, I., Inorg. Chem. 38, 1795 (1999)Google Scholar
14. Rothe, J., Denecke, M.A., Neck, V., Muller, R., and Kim, J.I., Inorg. Chem. 41, 249 (2002)Google Scholar
15. Johansson, G., Acta Chem. Scand. 22, 399 (1968)Google Scholar