Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T13:24:01.444Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Study of the Origin of Misorientation in GaN Grown by Pendeo-Epitaxy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

D. N. Zakharov
Affiliation:
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, MS 62–203, Berkeley, CA 94720
Z. Liliental-Weber
Affiliation:
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, MS 62–203, Berkeley, CA 94720
A. M. Roskowski
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Campus Box 7907, Raleigh, NC 27695
S. Einfeldt
Affiliation:
University of Bremen, Institute of Solid State Physics, P.O. Box 330440, 28334 Bremen, Germany
R. F. Davis
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Campus Box 7907, Raleigh, NC 27695
Get access

Abstract

Growth of pendeo-epitaxial (PE) layers introduces misorientation between the seed layers and the overgrown wing layers. The origin of this misorientation has been studied by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) using a set of samples in which subsequent procedures utilized in PE were applied, i.e. growth of GaN template, stripe etching, annealing at the growth temperature of the PE layers and final PE growth. It was shown that etching of seed-stripes did not change the type of defects or their distribution. However, heating to the PE growth temperature drastically modified the surface and V-shaped pits were formed. The surface became smooth again after the PE growth took place. Overgrowth of the V-shaped pits resulted in formation of edge threading dislocations over a seed-stripe region with a dislocation density of 8.0×108 cm−2. Formation of new edge dislocations over the seed can have an influence on the misorientation between the PE grown regions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Nam, O., Zheleva, T., Bremser, M., and Davis, R.F., J. Electron Matter. 27, 333 (1998)Google Scholar
2. Marhard, H., Wu, X.H., Ibbetson, J.P., Fini, P.T., Kozodoy, P., Peck, J.S., DenBaars, S.P., and Mishra, U.K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 747 (1998)Google Scholar
3. Liliental-Weber, Z. and Cherns, D., J. Appl. Phys., 89, 7833 (2001)Google Scholar
4. Zeleva, T., Smith, S., Thomson, D., Linthicum, K., Rajagopal, P., and Davis, R.F., J. Electron Matter. 28, L5 (1999)Google Scholar
5. Linthicum, K., Gehrke, T., Thomson, D., Carlson, E., Rajagopal, P., Smith, T., Batchelor, D., and Davis, R.F., Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 196 (1999)Google Scholar
6. Liliental-Weber, Z., Jasinski, J., Cherns, D., Baines, M., and Davis, R., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 693, 309 (2002)Google Scholar
7. Miraglia, P.Q., Preble, E.A., Einfeldt, S., Stiles, T., Davis, R.F., Schuck, J., Grober, R., and Schwarz, U., Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) 188, No. 2, 729732 (2001)Google Scholar
8. Einfeldt, S., Roskowski, A.M., Preble, E.A., and Davis, R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 953 (2002)Google Scholar
9. Roskowski, Amy M., Preble, Edward A., Einfeldt, Sven, Miraglia, Peter M., Davis, Robert F., IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 38, 1006 (2002).Google Scholar
10. Jasinski, J. and Liliental-Weber, Z., J. Electron. Mat. 31, 429 (2002)Google Scholar
11. Liliental-Weber, Z., Chen, Y., Ruvimov, S., and Washburn, J., Phys Rev. Lett. 79, 2835 1997 Google Scholar
12. Romano, L.T., EMIS Datareviews Series No. 23, INSPEC, London, UK, p. 221 (1999)Google Scholar
13. Romano, L.T., Krusor, B.S., Molnar, R.J., Appl. Phys. Lett., 71, 2283 (1997)Google Scholar