Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:30:03.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Study of The Hydrothermal Synthesis of Gallium Phosphates Using in Situ Time-Resolved X-Ray Diffraction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2011

R.I. Walton
Affiliation:
Inorganic Chemistry Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QR, UK, [email protected]
T. Loiseau
Affiliation:
Institut Lavoisier, UMR CNRS C173, Université de Versailles-Saint Quentin-en-Yvelines, 45, avenue des Etats-Unis, 78035 Versailles, Cedex, France
R.J. Francis
Affiliation:
Inorganic Chemistry Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QR, UK, [email protected]
D. O'Hare
Affiliation:
Inorganic Chemistry Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QR, UK, [email protected]
G. Férey
Affiliation:
Institut Lavoisier, UMR CNRS C173, Université de Versailles-Saint Quentin-en-Yvelines, 45, avenue des Etats-Unis, 78035 Versailles, Cedex, France
Get access

Abstract

The hydrothermal crystallisation (130-180 °C) of three-dimensional open-framework gallium and aluminium oxyfluoro-phosphates with the ULM-3 and ULM-4 structures have been studied in situ for the first time. The in situ energy-dispersive X-ray diffraction method has allowed the formation of the crystalline products to be observed under hydrothermal conditions The integrated areas of the strongest Bragg reflections has allowed quantitative kinetic data to be extracted. The effect of temperature, phosphorus source, templating agent have been investigated. The nature of phosphorus source in the reaction mixture has been found to affect dramatically the course of reaction for certain combinations of amine and temperature. Previously unobserved transient crystalline phases have been seen during the production of ULM-3 gallium phosphates when P2O5 or polyphosphoric acid are used. The formation of these intermediates affects the kinetics of product growth. In the case of the aluminium ULM-3 materials reaction always proceeds via a crystalline intermediate whatever phosphorus source is used. The ULM-4 framework materials are found to always crystallise directly with no evidence for any intermediates. Kinetic data for each system have been modelled using standard solid-state chemistry expressions, and these calculations indicate the reactions to be diffusion controlled.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Wilson, S.T., Lok, B.M., Messina, C.A., Cannon, T.R. and Flanigen, E.M., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 104, 1146 (1982).Google Scholar
2. Zones, S.I. and Davis, M.E., Curr. Opin. in Solid State and Mater. Sci., 1, 107 (1996).Google Scholar
3. Férey, G, J. Fluor. Chem., 72, 187 (1995).Google Scholar
4. Francis, R.J., Price, S.J., O'Brien, S., Fogg, A.M., O'Hare, D., Loiseau, T. and Férey, G., Chem. Commun. 1997 521.Google Scholar
5. Francis, R.J., O'Brien, S., Fogg, A.M., Halasyamani, P.S., O'Hare, D., Loiseau, T. and FHrey, G., J. Am. Chem. Soc., in press (1998).Google Scholar
6. Evans, J.S.O., Francis, R.J., O'Hare, D., Price, S.J., Clark, S.M., Flaherty, J., Nield, A. and Tang, C.C., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 66, 2442 (1995).Google Scholar
7. O'Hare, D., Evans, J.S.O., Francis, R.J., Halasyamani, P.S., Norby, P., Hanson, J., Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 21, 253 (1998).Google Scholar
8. Barnes, P., Jupe, A.C., Colston, S.L., Jacques, S.D., Grant, A., Rathbone, T., Miller, M., Clark, S.M. and Cernik, R.J., Nucl. Ins.and Meth. in Phy. Res. B, 134 (2) 130, (1998).Google Scholar
9. Greenwood, N.N. and Earnshaw, A., Chemistry of the Elements (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1989), p601.Google Scholar
10. Origin, Microcal Software, Inc, Northhampton, USA.Google Scholar
11. Hancock, J.D. and Sharp, J.H., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc., 55, 74 (1972).Google Scholar