Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:48:02.674Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Study of the effect of morphology of nanoporous carbon membranes on permselectivity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

Ramakrishnan Rajagopalan
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering 158, Fenske Laboratory University Park, PA 16802
Henry C. Foley
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering 158, Fenske Laboratory University Park, PA 16802
Get access

Abstract

The present work is aimed at developing uniform nanoporous carbon membranes on porous stainless steel supports. Thin layers of polyfurfuryl alcohol are applied on the stainless steel supports using spin coating method. Nanoporous carbon is obtained by pyrolyzing polyfurfuryl alcohol films under inert atmosphere. Uniform nanoporous carbon membranes were obtained by repeated spin coating and pyrolysis of polyfurfuryl alcohol on the stainless steel supports. The morphology of the membranes was examined using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM). It was shown that there is direct correlation between the morphology and the selectivity of the membranes. SEM and AFM show the presence of globular domains during the formation of carbon membranes. The selectivity increased with the decrease in the size of the globules. It was also shown that the annealing of the membrane affected both the morphology and the selectivity of the membrane.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Strano, M.S. and Foley, H.C., Aiche Journal, 47 (2001) 6678.Google Scholar
2. Shiflett, M.B. and Foley, H.C., J. Membrane Sci., 179 (2000) 275282.Google Scholar
3. Shiflett, M.B. M.B. and Foley, H.C., Carbon, 39 (2001) 14211425.Google Scholar
4. Stevens, M.G., Anderson, M.R.. and Foley, H.C., Chem. Commun. 5, 413414 (1999).Google Scholar
5. Franklin, R.E., Acta Crystallogr., 3 (1950) 107.Google Scholar
6. Franklin, R.E., Proc. R. Soc., A209 (1951) 196.Google Scholar
7. Kipling, J.J. and Wilson, R.B., Trans. Faraday Soc., 56 (1960) 557.Google Scholar
8. Kipling, J.J. and Wilson, R.B., Trans Faraday Soc., 56 (1960) 562.Google Scholar
9. Foley, H.C., Microporous Mat., 4 (1995) 407433.Google Scholar
10. Walker, P.L., Austin, L.G. and Nandi, S.P., Chemistry and Physics of Carbon, Vol.2 Marcel Dekker, New York, NY 1965, p 275.Google Scholar
11. Fitzer, E. and Schaefer, W., Carbon, 8 (1970) 353.Google Scholar
12. Fitzer, E., Schaefer, W. and Yamada, S., Carbon, 7 (1969) 643.Google Scholar
13. Mariwala, R.K. and Foley, H.C., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 33 (1994) 607.Google Scholar
14. Li, G., Lu, Z., Huang, B., Wang, Z., Huang, H., Xue, R. and Chen, L., Solid State Ionics, 89 (1996) 327331.Google Scholar
15. Shiflett, M.B. and Foley, H.C., Science, 285 (1999) 19021905.Google Scholar
16. Acharya, M. and Foley, H.C., J. Membrane Sci., 161 (1999) 15.Google Scholar
17. Acharya, M., Raich, B.A., Foley, H.C., Harold, M.P. and Lerou, J.J., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 8 (1997) 29242930.Google Scholar