Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T10:56:18.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Study and Optimization of PECVD Films Containing Fluorine and Carbon Layered with Diamond Like Carbon Films as Ultra Low Dielectric Constant Interlayer Dielectrics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2013

Nandini G. Sundaram
Affiliation:
Triquint Semiconductor, Inc., 2300 NE Brookwood Parkway, Hillsboro, OR 97124, U.S.A.
Seetharaman Ramachandran
Affiliation:
Lam Research Corporation, 4650, Cushing Parkway, Fremont, CA 94538, U.S.A.
Gil-Sik Lee
Affiliation:
The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75083, USA.
Lawrence Overzet
Affiliation:
The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75083, USA.
Get access

Abstract

Layered dielectric films comprising of Diamond like Carbon (DLC) and Amorphous Fluorocarbon (a:C-F) were generated using three different stack configurations for ultra low dielectric constant (ULK) applications. These include a DLC – a:C-F – DLC sandwich, a:C-F – DLC topcoat only and an annealed a:C-F – DLC topcoat only film stack. These films were subsequently evaluated for thickness, dielectric constant, contact angle, surface roughness and chemical structure using IR analysis. Thermal stability was analyzed after annealing in Argon ambient at 400°C for 1 hour. Deposition conditions were optimized for film thickness, roughness, dielectric constant and contact angle using Minitab by tuning process pressure, substrate temperature and FRR. The modified Gaseous Electronics Conference (mGEC) reference cell was used to deposit DLC films using CH4 and Argon as precursors. Structural properties of the deposited thin film were studied using laser excitation of 633 nm in a Jobin Yvon Labram high-resolution micro-Raman spectrometer. Multiple points on each sample were analyzed in terms of the disordered carbon (D-peak) and graphitic carbon (G-peak). The thin film of DLC was subsequently annealed in Ar ambient for 1 hr at 400°C and analyzed. Commercially available graphing software was utilized to deconvolute peaks and the ratio of their intensities as well as the shift in their positions were determined to characterize the as-deposited and annealed film. The film was further characterized using AFM, FTIR, XRD, goniometry and electrical testing. Average film roughness as measured by AFM was less than 1 nm, the k-value was 2.5 and the contact angle with water was 42°. A:C-F films were separately deposited using CF4 and Si2H6 (5% by volume in He) as precursors in a UNAXIS PECVD system. Films deposited using substrate temperatures between 120°C – 200°C, chamber pressure of 300 and 500 mTorr and power of 100 W were independently evaluated in terms of their electrical, physical, structural and optical properties prior to layering with DLC films. After process optimization, seven unique process conditions generated promising layered films with k-values between 1.69 and 1.95. Of these, only one film exhibited very low shrinkage rates acceptable for semiconductor device processing.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Maex, K., Baklanov, M.R., Shamriyan, D., Lacopi, F., Brongersma, S.H. and Yanovitskaya, Z.S., Appl Phys Lett. 93, 8793 (2003).Google Scholar
Grill, A., Diam. And Rel. Mater. 10, 234 (2001).10.1016/S0925-9635(00)00473-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jin, Y., Ajmera, P.K., Lee, G.S. and Singh, V., J of Elec. Mater. 34, 9 (2005)10.1007/s11664-005-0264-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, T.H., Im, Y.H. and Hahn, Y.B., Chem. Phys. Lett. 368, 36 (2003).10.1016/S0009-2614(02)01715-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, H., Shin, J., Kwon, D., Seo, H. and Lee, G.S., Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 44, 7A, 4886 (2005).10.1143/JJAP.44.4886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takeishi, S., Kudo, H., Shinohara, R., Hoshino, M., Fukuyama, S., Yamaguchi, J., and Yamada, M. and J. Electrochem. Soc. 144, 5, 1797 (1997).10.1149/1.1837682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, J., Mat. Sci.. and Engineering, R 37, 129 (2002).10.1016/S0927-796X(02)00005-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramachandran, S., Tao, L., Lee, T. H., Sant, S., Overzet, L. J., Goeckner, M. J., Kim, M. J., Lee, G. S. and Hu, W., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 24, 6, 2993 (2006).10.1116/1.2363409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goeckner, M.J., Marquis, J.M., Markham, B.J., Jindal, A.K., Joseph, E.A. and Zhou, B.-S., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 75, 884 (2004).10.1063/1.1688443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theil, J.A., Mertz, F., Yairi, M., Seaward, K., Ray, G. and Kooi, G., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 476, 32 (1997).10.1557/PROC-476-31CrossRefGoogle Scholar