Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:04:30.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on Titanium Nitride Coatings - Effect of Ion Bombardment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

K. Deenamma Vargheese  and
G. Mohan Rao
K. Deenamma Vargheese
Affiliation:
Department of Instrumentation Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, 560012, INDIA
G. Mohan Rao
Affiliation:
Department of Instrumentation Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, 560012, INDIA
Get access

Abstract

Ion bombardment during thin film growth is known to cause structural and morphological changes in the deposited films and thus affecting the film properties. These effects can be due to the variation in the bombarding ion flux or their energy. We have deposited titanium nitride films by two distinctly different methods, viz. Electron Cyclotron Resonance (ECR) plasma sputtering and bias assisted reactive magnetron sputtering. The former represents low energy (typically less than 30 eV) but high density plasma (1011cm−3), whereas, in the latter case the ion energy is controlled by varying the bias to the substrate (typically a few hundred volts) but the ion flux is low (109cm−3). The deposited titanium nitride films are characterized for their structure, grain size, surface roughness and electrical resistivity.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 647: Symposium O – Ion Beam Synthesis & Processing of Advanced Materials , 2000 , O11.9
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Smith, F. A., Int.Mater.Rev. 35, 61 (1990)Google Scholar
2. Grigorov, K. G., Grigorov, G. I., Stoyanova, M., Vignes, J. L., Langeron, J. P., Denjean, P. and and Perriere, J., Appl. Phys. A 55, 502 (1992).Google Scholar
3. Patsalas, P., Charitidis, C., Logothetidis, S., Dimitriadis, C. A., and Valassiades, O.. J. Appl. Phys. 86, 5296 (1999).Google Scholar
4. Carney, Carl and Durham, Delcie, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 17, 2535 (1999).Google Scholar
5. Charatan, R. M., Gross, M. E., and Eaglesham, D. J., J. Appl. Phys. 76, 4377 (1994).Google Scholar
6. Rauschenbach, B., Zeitler, M., Gerlach, J. W. and Stritzker, B., Nucl. Instr. Meth B 127/128, 813 (1997).Google Scholar
7. Ensinger, W., Nucl. Instr. Meth. B56/57, 648 (1991).Google Scholar
8. Park, Ki-Chul, Kim, Ki-Bum, Raaijimakers, Ivo J. M. M. and Ngan, Ken, J. Appl. Phys. 80, 5674 (1996).Google Scholar
9. Kim, Soo-Hyum, Chung, Deuk-Seok, Park, Ki-Chul, Kim, Ki-Bum, and Min, Seok-Hong, J. Electrochem. Soc. 146, 1455 (1999).Google Scholar
10. Vargheese, K. Deenamma and Rao, G. Mohan, J.Appl.Phys. 87, 7544 (2000).Google Scholar
11. Poitevin, J. M., Lemperiere, G. and Tardy, J., Thin Solid Films 97, 69 (1982).Google Scholar
12. Sundgren, J. E., Thin Solid Films, 128, 21 (1985)Google Scholar
13. Thornton, J. A., Ann. Rev. Mater. Sci. 7, 239 (1977).Google Scholar
14. Sundgren, J. E., Thin Solid Films 128, 21 (1985).Google Scholar
15. Park, Ki-Chul and Kim, Ki-Bum, J. Electrochem. Soc. 142, 3109 (1995).Google Scholar