Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:52:26.171Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies on SiBN(C)-ceramics: Oxidation- and Crystallization Behavior Lead the Way to Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

H.-P. Baldus
Affiliation:
Bayer AG, ZF-MFA, D-51368 Leverkusen, Germany
G. Passing
Affiliation:
Bayer AG, ZF-MFA, D-51368 Leverkusen, Germany
Get access

Abstract

The thermal stability of amorphous borosilicon nitride (Si3B3N7) and borosilicon carbonitride (SiBN3C) between 1000°C and 2000oC both in air and under inert conditions is reported. Both materials are derived from polymerization and subsequent pyrolysis of a “single source” precursor. On heating in vacuum or nitrogen SiBN3C remains amorphous up to lCWC whereas Si3B3N7 crystallizes at about 1800°C under these conditions. At about 2000^ the SiBN(C)-materials decompose into SiC, BN, B4C and N2.

Oxidation studies performed by TEM- and SEM-investigations of oxidized borosilicon carbonitride grains reveal that an interlayer consisting of B, N, and only little O is formed between the oxide scale on the surface and the inner bulk material. The interlayer does not disappear at temperatures above 1450°C in contrast to the Si2N20-interiayer observed on oxidized silicon nitride. The oxidation kinetics of the new ceramics are established in the range from 1000°C to 1600°C indicating a very high oxidation resistance. Possible applications as matrix materials as well as materials for fibers and coatings are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Mazdiyasni, K.S., Ruh., R., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 64, 415 (1981).Google Scholar
2 Lee, J.D., Moeller, H.H., Petrak, D.R., Bemeburg, P.L., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull., 6 (3), 422 (1984).Google Scholar
3 Bellosi., A. Guicciardi, S., Tampieri, A., J. Euro. Ceram. Soc., 9, 83 (1992).Google Scholar
4 Riedel, R., Darmstadt, T.H., (private communication).Google Scholar
5 Sawaguchi, A., Toda, K., Niihara, K., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 74 (5), 1142 (1991).Google Scholar
6 Funayama, O., Kato, T., Tashiro, Y., Isoda, T., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 76 (3), 717 (1993).Google Scholar
7 Seyferth, D., Plenio, H., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 73 (7), 2131 (1990).Google Scholar
8 Su, K., Remsen, E.E., Zank, G.A., Sneddon, L.G., Chem. Mater., 5, 547 (1993).Google Scholar
9 Baldus, H.-P., Schnick, W., Liicke, J., Wannagat, U., Bogedain, G., Chem. Mater., 5, 845 (1993).Google Scholar
10 Baldus, H.-P., Wagner, O., and Jansen, M. in Better Ceramics through Chemistry V edited by Hampden-Smith, M.J., Klemperer, W.G. and Brinker, C.J. (Mat Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 271, Pittsburgh, PA, 1992) pp 821826.Google Scholar
11 Ogbuji, Linus U.J.T, J.Am. Ceram. Soc., 75 (11), 2995 (1992).Google Scholar
12 Riedel, R., Passing, G., Schönfelder, H., Brook, R.J., Nature, 355, 714 (1992).Google Scholar