Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:22:04.191Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies of Laser Annealed GaAs (100), (110) and (111) Surfaces*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

D. M. Zehner
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830
C. W. White
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830
B. R. Appleton
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830
G. W. Ownby
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830
Get access

Abstract

The surface regions of (100), (110) and (111) oriented single crystals of GaAs have been investigated by the combine techniques of LEED, AES and RBS subsequent to their irradiation in UHV with the output of a Q–switched, ruby laser (0.15−0.8 J/cm2, 15 × 10−9 sec). Clean surfaces, as determined by AES, were obtained after Ar+ sputtering followed by laser irradiation. LEED observations indicate that the degree of disorder in the outermost surface layers remaining after irradiation depends on the crystal orientation. Although the relative intensities of Ga and As Auger transitions in spectra obtained from sputtered and laser annealed surfaces are similar, the differences in lineshape in these spectra of the M2,3M4,5M4,5 Ga Auger transition indicate that in the laser annealed case there are local regions which are nonstoichiometric. These observations are confirmed by RBS results, and this technique has been used to determine the stoichiometry and to characterize the damage in the subsurface region for all orientations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Research sponsored by the Division of Materials Sciences, U. S. Department of Energy under contract W–7405–eng–26 with Union Carbide Corporation.

References

REFERENCES

1. Zehner, D. M., White, C. W. and Ownby, G. W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 36, 56 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Zehner, D. M., White, C. W. and Ownby, G. W., Surf. Sci. 92, L67 (1980);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2a Appl. Phys. Lett. 37, 456 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. White, C. W., Narayan, J. and Young, R. T., Science 204, 461 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Golovchenko, J. A. and Venkatesan, T. N. C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 32, 147 (1978);Google Scholar
4a Venkatesan, T. N. C., Anston, D. H., Golovchenko, J. A. and Surko, C. M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 35, 88 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Fletcher, J., Narayan, J. and Lowndes, D. H., Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. No. 60: Section 2, (The Institute of Physics 1981), pp. 121–126.Google Scholar
6. Appleton, B. R. in: Defects in Semiconductors, Narayan, J. and Tan, T. Y. eds. (North Holland, New York 1981), p. 97.Google Scholar
7. Jona, F., IBM J. Res. 9, 375 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Cho, A. Y. and Hayashi, I., Solid State Electron. 14, 125 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Eastman, D. E., Chiang, T.–C., Heimann, P. and Himpsel, F. J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 656 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar