Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:40:08.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stucture of 1/2<110> Dislocations In γ-Tial by High Resolution Tem and Embedded Atom Method Modelling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

J. P. Simmons ,
M. J. Mills  and
S. I. Rao
J. P. Simmons
Affiliation:
AFOSR/NRC Associate, WL/MLLM, Wright Patterson AFB, OH 45433
M. J. Mills
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University, Department of MS&E, Columbus, OH 43210
S. I. Rao
Affiliation:
UES, Inc., Materials Directorate WL/MLLM, Wright Patterson AFB, OH 45433
Get access

Abstract

High Resolution TEM (HRTEM) observations of a dislocation in γ-TiAl are compared directly with atomistic calculations of dislocation structures performed with atomistic potentials in order to obtain an estimate of the Complex Stacking Fault Energy (γcsf). A value of between 470 and 620 mJ/M2 was obtained. HRTEM observations are presented of a Ti-52AI sample, containing a dislocation with Burgers vector 1/2<110> and 60° line orientation. This image is matched against images simulated from the outputs of Embedded Atom Method (EAM) simulations, using potentials that were fit to bulk γ-TiAl properties. Two atomistic simulation methods were employed in order to give the range of values for γcsf. In the first of these methods, three EAM potentials were used to simulate the stress-free core structure. These were fit so as to produce three different values of γcsf, all other properties being roughly the same as the literature values for γ-TiAI. All of these potentials produced cores that were more extended than the experimental observation. Thus a value of 470 mJ/M2, being the highest value of γcsf obtainable for the EAM potentials, is reported as a low limit estimate of γcsf for γ-TiAl. An upper limit estimate of the value of γcsf was obtained by applying an external ‘Escaig’ stress that forced the Shockley partials to further constrict, simulating the effect of an increase in γcsf, The preliminary value calculated from this procedure was 620 mJ/M2.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 364: Symposium L – High-Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys–VI , 1994 , 137
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kim, Y.W. and Dimiduk, D.M.: JIMIS-7 Conference on High Temperature Deformation and Fracture, Nagoya, Japan, 1993, pp. 373–382.Google Scholar
2. Kim, Y.W. and Dimiduk, D.M.: J. of Metals, 1991, vol. 43, p. 40.Google Scholar
3. Kim, Y.W.: Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., MRS, Boston, MA, 1991, vol. 213, p. 777.Google Scholar
4. Kim, Y.W.: J.O.M., 1994, vol. 46, pp. 30–40.Google Scholar
5. Hug, G., Loiseau, A., and Lasalmonie, A.: Phil. Mag. A, 1986, vol. 54, pp. 47–65.Google Scholar
6. Hug, G.: Thesis, University of Orsay (France), 1988.Google Scholar
7. Hug, G., Loiseau, A., and Veyssiere, P.: Phil. Mag. A, 1988, vol. 57, pp. 499–523.Google Scholar
8. Shechtman, D., Blackburn, M.J., and Lipsitt, H.A.: Metall. Trans., 1974, vol. 5, pp. 1373–1381.Google Scholar
9. Vasudevan, V.K., Stucke, M.A., Court, S.A., and Fraser, H.L.: Phil. Mag. Lett., 1989, vol. 59, pp. 299–307.Google Scholar
10. E.L. Hall and S.C. Huang: Mat. Res. Soc. Symp., MRS, Boston, MA, 1989, vol. 133, pp. 693–698.Google Scholar
11. Sriram, S., Vasudevan, V.K., and Dimiduk, D.M.: Mat. Res. Soc. Symp., Materials Research Society, Boston, MA, 1991, vol. 213, pp. 375.Google Scholar
12. Kawabata, T., Kanai, T., and Izumi, O.: Acta Metall., 1985, vol. 33, pp. 1355–1366.Google Scholar
13. Greenberg, B.A. and Gornostriev, Y.N.: Scripta Metall., 1988, vol. 22, p. 853.Google Scholar
14. Greenberg, B.A., Antonova, O.V., Indenbaum, V.N., Karkina, L.E., Notkin, A.B., Ponomarev, M.V., and Smirnov, L.V.: Acta Metall. Mater., 1991, vol. 39, pp. 233–242.Google Scholar
15. Viguier, B., Hemker, K.J., Bonneville, J., Louchet, F., and Martin, J.L.: Submitted to Phil. Mag A.Google Scholar
16. Louchet, F. and Viguier, B.: Scr. Metall. et Mater., 1994, vol. 31, pp. 369–374.Google Scholar
17. Louchet, F. and B., Submitted to Phil. Mag. A.Google Scholar
18. Woodward, C., MacLauren, J.M., and Rao, S.I.: J. Mater. Res, 1992, vol. 7, pp. 1735–1750.Google Scholar
19. Simmons, J.P., Rao, S.I., and Dimiduk, D.M.: Alloy Modelling and Design, Stocks, G.M., eds., TMS, Pittsburgh, PA, 1993.Google Scholar
20. Fu, C.L. and Yoo, M.H.: Phil. Mag. Lett., 1990, vol. 62, p. 159.Google Scholar
21. Fu, C.L. and Yoo, M.H.: J. Intermetallics, 1993, vol. 1, p. 59.Google Scholar
22. Simmons, J.P., Rao, S.I., and Dimiduk, D.M.: Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc, MRS, Boston, MA, 1992, vol. 288, pp. 335–342.Google Scholar
23. Daw, M.S. and Baskes, M.I.: Phys. Rev. B, 1984, vol. 29, pp. 6443–6453.Google Scholar
24. Daw, M.S. and Baskes, M.I.: Phys. Rev. Lett., 1983, vol. 50, pp. 1285–1288.Google Scholar
25. Voter, A.F. and Chen, S.P.: Mat. Res. Soc. Symp., MRS, Boston, MA, 1987, vol. 82, pp. 175–180.Google Scholar
26. Rao, S.I., Woodward, C., and Parathasarathy, T.A.: Mat. Res. Soc, MRS, Boston, 1991, vol. 213, pp. 125–130.Google Scholar
27. Krivanek: Optik, 1976, vol. 45, p. 97.Google Scholar
28. Fu, C.L. and Yoo, M.: Mater. Res. Soc Symp. Proc., MRS, Boston, 1990, vol. 186, p. 265.Google Scholar
29. Stroh, A.N.: Phil. Mag., 1958, vol. 3, pp. 625–646.Google Scholar
30. Greenberg: Phys. Stat. Sol., 1970, vol. 42, pp. 459–468.Google Scholar
31. Hirth, J.P. and Lothe, J.: Theory of Dislocations. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968.Google Scholar
32. Peach, M.O. and Koehler, J.S.: Phys. Rev., 1950, vol. 80, p. 436.Google Scholar
33. Escaig, B.: Battelle Colloq. on Dislocation Dynamics, MacGraw-Hill, Seattle, WA, 1967, pp. 655–677.Google Scholar
34. Escaig, B.: J. Physique, 1968, vol. 29, pp. 225–239.Google Scholar
35. Nye, J.F.: Physical Properties of Crystals. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1957.Google Scholar
36. Stadelmann, P.: Ultramicroscopy, 1987, vol. 21, p. 131.Google Scholar
37. Buckett, M.I., Marks, L.D., and Luzzi, D.E.: Elect. Micr. Soc. Amer., 1987, vol. 45, p. 752.Google Scholar