Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:31:07.001Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structure of a Near-Coincidence Σ9 Tilt Grain Boundary in Aluminum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

M. J. Mills
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA 94551-0969
G. J. Thomas
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA 94551-0969
M. S. Daw
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA 94551-0969
F. Cosandey
Affiliation:
Department of Mech. and Mat. Sci., Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854.
Get access

Abstract

A systematic study of the structure of tilt grain boundaries in aluminum has been initiated. High resolution transmission electron microscopy is being used to examine the interface structure of several bicrystals with <110> tilt axes. In this paper, we report the structure determination of a grain boundary close to the Σ9 (221) symmetric orientation. The grain boundary plane, which appears wavy at lower magnification, is actually composed of atomically flat microfacets. Two distinct, symmetric structures with (221) boundary planes have been identified within individual microfacets. These observations have been compared with structures calculated using the Embedded Atom Method. The semi-quantitative comparison between the observed and predicted grain boundary structures is accomplished using multislice image simulations based on the calculated structures. The results of these comparisons and the evaluation of the relative energies of the microfacets are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Watanabe, T., Met. Trans., 14A, 531 (1983).Google Scholar
2. King, A. H. and Smith, D. A., Acta Cryst., A36, 335 (1980).Google Scholar
4. Daw, M. S. and Baskes, M. I., Phys. Rev., B29, 6443 (1984).Google Scholar
4. Foiles, S. M., Acta Metall., 37, 2815 (1989).Google Scholar
5. , Voter and , Chen, MRS Proceedings, 82, 175 (1987).Google Scholar
6. Stadelmann, P., Ultramicrosopy, 21, 131 (1987).Google Scholar
7. Vitek, V., Sutton, A. P., Wang, G. J. and Schwartz, D., Scripta Metall., 17, 183 (1983).Google Scholar
8. Forwood, C. T. and Clarebrough, L. M., Acta Metall., 30, 1443 (1982).Google Scholar
9. Pond, R. C. and Vitek, V., Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 357, 453 (1977).Google Scholar
10. Pond, R. C., Smith, D. A. and Vitek, V., Acta Metall., 27, 235 (1979).Google Scholar
11. Bourret, A., Billard, L. and Petit, M., Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser., 76, 23 (1985).Google Scholar