Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:53:48.182Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Structure and Elastic Properties of Ni/Cu and Ni/Au Multilayers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1992

Ademola Taiwo ,
Hong Yan  and
Gretchen Kalonji
Ademola Taiwo
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science & Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 Department of Nuclear Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139
Hong Yan
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science & Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195
Gretchen Kalonji
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science & Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195
Get access

Abstract

The structure and elastic properties of Ni/Cu and Ni/Au multilayer systems are investigated as a function of the number of Ni monolayers built into the systems. We employed lattice statics simulations with the interatomic potentials described by the embedded-atom method. For the Ni/Cu systems, coherent interfaces and FCC structure are maintained, and no elastic anomaly is found. For the Ni/Au systems, when the Ni layers are thick enough, they undergo a strain-induced phase transformation from FCC to HCP structure. An enhancement of Young’s modulus of these systems is found to be associated with this structural change.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 291: Symposium O – Materials Theory and Modeling , 1992 , 479
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Yang, W.M.C., Tsakalakos, T., and Hilliard, J.E., J. Appl. Phys., 48. 876 (1977).Google Scholar
2 Schuller, I.K., Fartash, A., and Grimsditch, M., MRS Bulletin, XV(10), 33 (1990).Google Scholar
3 Pickett, W.E., J. Phys. F, 12. 2195 (1982); Wu, T.B., J. Appl. Phys., L3, 5265 (1982).Google Scholar
4 Jankowski, A.F. and Tsakalakos, T., J. Phys. F, 15, 1279 (1985); Mater. Sci. Eng., B6, 87 (1990).Google Scholar
5 Huberman, M.L. and Grimsditch, M., Phys. Rev. Lett., 62, 1403 (1989).Google Scholar
6 Cammarata, R.C. and Sieradzki, K., Phys. Rev. Lett., 62, 2005 (1989).Google Scholar
7 Wolf, D. and Lutsko, J.F., J. Appl. Phys., 66, 1961 (1989); J. Mater. Res., 4, 1427 (1989).Google Scholar
8 Jaszczak, J.A., Phillpot, S. R., and Wolf, D., J. Appl. Phys., 68, 4573 (1990); Jaszczak, J.A. and Wolf, D., J. Mater. Res., 6, 1207 (1991).Google Scholar
9 Daw, M.S. and Baskes, M.I., Phys. Rev. B, 29, 6443 (1984).Google Scholar
10 Foiles, S.M., Baskes, M.I., and Daw, M.S., Phys. Rev. B, 33, 7983 (1986).Google Scholar
11 Dodson, B.W., Phys. Rev. B, 37, 727 (1988); Mintmire, J.W., Mater. Sci. Eng., A126. 29 (1990).Google Scholar
12 Lutsko, J.F., J. Appl. Phys., 65, 2991 (1989).Google Scholar
13 Yan, H., Taiwo, A., and Kalonji, G., unpublished.Google Scholar
14 Hoekestra, J., Yan, H., and Kalonji, G., unpublished.Google Scholar