Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:31:35.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structural Characterization of Pt/Co Multilayers for Magnetooptic Recording Using X-Ray Diffraction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2012

James A. Bain
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford CA, 94305–2205
Bruce M. Clemens
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford CA, 94305–2205
Sean Brennan
Affiliation:
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lab, Stanford, CA 94309
Get access

Abstract

Structural features in magnetic multilayer films such as interfacial sharpness and in-plane stress are regarded as responsible for the perpendicular magnetic anisotropy observed in these films. The Multilayers often consist of alternating magnetic and non-Magnetic layers, and the degree of interfacial sharpness between the two is a critical component in producing perpendicular anisotropy. Additionally, in-plane stress affects the anisotropy through Magnetostriction. In this work, we measure both the composition modulation and the stress in multilayers of Pt/CO with x-ray diffraction. Quantitative information about the composition modulation is extracted by recursively fitting a model of multilayer diffraction to the high angle superlattice lines. The Model incorporates a composition modulation of variable amplitude, along with a statistical description of the layer thickness fluctuations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Hashimoto, S., Ochiai, Y. and Aso, K., J. of Appl. Phys., 66, 4908 (1989).Google Scholar
2. Spörl, K. and Weller, D., J. of Mag. and Mag. Mat., 93, 379 (1991).Google Scholar
3. Chikazumi, S. and Charap, S.H., Physics of Magnetism. (R.E. Krieger Pub. Co., Malabar, Florida, 1986).Google Scholar
4. Hashimoto, S., Ochiai, Y., and Aso, K., J. of Mag. and Mag. Mat., 66, 4909 (1989).Google Scholar
5. den Broeder, F.J.A., Hoving, W., and Bloemen, P.J.H., J. of Mag. and Mag. Mat., 93, 562 (1991).Google Scholar
6. Clemens, B.M. and Bain, J.A., MRS Bulletin, 17, 46 (1992).Google Scholar
7. Fullerton, E.E., Schuller, I.K., Vanderstraeten, H., Bruynseraede, Y., Phys. Rev. B, 45, 9292 (1992).Google Scholar
8. Miyajima, H., Sato, K. and Mizoguchi, T., J. of Appl. Phys., 47, 4669 (1976).Google Scholar
9. Sanchez, J.M., Morán-López, J.L., Leroux, C. and Cadeville, M.C., J. Phys: Cond. Matt., 1, 491 (1989).Google Scholar
10. Hoffman, D.W. and Thornton, J.A., J. of Vac. Sci. Technol., 16, 134 (1979).Google Scholar
11. Hoffman, D.W. and Thornton, J.A., J. of Vac. Sci. Technol., 20, 355 (1982).Google Scholar
12. Hoffman, D.W., Thin Solid Films, 107, 353 (1983).Google Scholar