Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T00:58:10.749Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structural Changes During Transient Post-Annealing of Preannealed and Arsenic Implanted Polycrystalline Silicon Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

S. J. Krause
Affiliation:
Depar-tment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287
S. R. Wilson
Affiliation:
Semiconductor Research and Development Laboratories, Motorola, Inc., 5005 E. McDowell Road, Phoenix, AZ 85008.
R. B. Gregory
Affiliation:
Semiconductor Research and Development Laboratories, Motorola, Inc., 5005 E. McDowell Road, Phoenix, AZ 85008.
W. M. Paulson
Affiliation:
Semiconductor Research and Development Laboratories, Motorola, Inc., 5005 E. McDowell Road, Phoenix, AZ 85008.
J. A. Leavitt
Affiliation:
Depar-tment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287
L. C. McIntyre Jr.
Affiliation:
Depar-tment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287
J. L. Seerveld
Affiliation:
Depar-tment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287
P. Stoss
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721
Get access

Abstract

Polycrystalline silicon films were transient preannealed, As implanted, and transient post-annealed at peak temperatures up to 1250°C for times up to 17.5 seconds. Structural changes occurring during post-annealing were examined by transmission electron microscopy. These results were correlated to Rutherford Backscattering and sheet resistance results. The grain size, which increased from 5–20 to 150–300 nm during preannealing, did not increase during post-annealing. During early stages of post-annealing, As diffused along grain boundaries and generated dislocation sources at grain boundary surfaces. Subsequently, as annealing progressed, a fine, As-rich cellular network structure propagated into the grains until the structure of an entire grain was transformed into a fine cellular network at the longest annealing times. Residual stresses in the film were relieved during formation of the network structure. The sheet resistance of preannealed samples, in comparison with non-preannealed samples with similar implantation and final transient anneals, was lower at shorter annealing times due to the larger grain size, which increased mobility, and the reduced grain boundary area, which trapped less As. It was also lower at longer annealing times due to the formation of the cellular network structure. In subsequent furnace stability tests for 30 minutes at 700–900°C, the sheet resistance increased less for preannealed than for non-preannealed samples.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Wilson, S.R., Gregory, R.B., Paulson, W.M., Krause, S.J., Gressett, J.D., Hamdi, A.H., McDaniel, F.D., and Downing, R.G., J. Electrochem. Soc. 132, 922 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Krause, S.J., Wilson, S.R., Paulson, W.M., and Gregory, R.B., AppI. Phys. Lett. 45, 778 (1984).Google Scholar
3. Krause, S.J., Wilson, S.R., Paulson, W.M. and Gregory, R.B., Proc. Mat. Res. Soc. 35, 721 (1985).Google Scholar
4. Wada, Y. and Nishimatsu, S., J. Electrochem. Soc, 125, 1499 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Wu, C.P., Schnable, G.L., Lee, B.W., and Strickler, R., J. Electrochem. Soc. 131, 216 (1984).Google Scholar
6. Wilson, S.R., Gregory, R.B., Paulson, W.M., Hamdi, A.H., and McDaniel, F.D., J. Appl. Phys. 55, 4162 (1984).Google Scholar
7. Hirsch, P.B., Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. 67, 1 (1983).Google Scholar
8. Washburn, J. and Thomas, G., J. Appl. Phys. 35, 1909 (1964).Google Scholar
9. Strunk, H., Gosele, U., and Kolbesen, B.O., J. Microscopy 11, 35 (1980).Google Scholar
10. Krause, S.J., Wilson, S.R., Paulson, W.M., and Gregory, R.B., Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. 76, 105 (1985).Google Scholar
11. Fogarassy, E.P., Lowndes, S.H., Narayan, J., and White, C.W., Proc. Mat. Res. Soc. 35, 419 (1985).Google Scholar
12. Doherty, R. D., in Recrystallization of Metallic Materials, edited by Hassner, F., (Riederer Verlag Publishers, Stuttgart, 1978), pp. 5054.Google Scholar