Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:50:33.474Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structural and Electrical Characterization of Hydrophobic Direct-Bonded Silicon Interfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Gordon Tam
Affiliation:
Advanced Custom Technologies
F. Secco d'Aragona
Affiliation:
Material Research and Strategic Technologies Motorola Inc., 2200 W. Broadway Road, Mesa, AZ 85202
N. David Theodore
Affiliation:
Material Research and Strategic Technologies Motorola Inc., 2200 W. Broadway Road, Mesa, AZ 85202
Get access

Abstract

Direct wafer bonding is a viable technique for fabricating high-voltage devices. An understanding of the microstructure and electrical behavior of the bonded interface is critical for device fabrication. In this paper, we investigated the microstructure of the silicon-to-silicon bonded interface using cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy and the corresponding electrical behavior using spreading resistance probing. Results indicate that oxide precipitates were present at the bonded interface when Czochralski silicon wafer were used in the process. Oxide precipitates were noticeably absent from the bonded interface when float zone wafers were bonded to each other. We find that oxide precipitates at the interface arise not due to the residual oxide at the surface prior to wafer bonding but due to gettering of oxygen from the Czochralski wafer. Spreading resistance measurements show occurrence of a high resistivity region at the bonding interface whether or not oxide precipitates are present.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Balinga, B., Adler, M., Love, R., Gray, P. and Zommer, N., IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. ED–31 (6), 821 (1984).Google Scholar
2 Russell, J., Goodman, A., Goodman, L., and Neilson, J., IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. EDL–4 (3), 63 (1983).Google Scholar
3 Balinga, B., Adler, M., Gray, P., Love, R., and Zommer, N., IEDM, 264 (1982)Google Scholar
4 Temple, V., IEDM, 282 (1984)Google Scholar
5 Nakagawa, A., Watanabe, K., Yamaguchi, Y., Ohashi, H., and Furukawa, K., IEDM, 122 (1986).Google Scholar
6 Ohashi, H., Furukawa, K., Atsuta, M., Nakagawa, A. and Imamura, K., IEDM, 678 (1987).Google Scholar
7 Bengtsson, S., and Engstrom, O., J. Appl. Phys. 66 (3), 1231 (1989).Google Scholar
8 Bengtsson, S., J. Electronic Mat. 21 (8), 841 (1992).Google Scholar
9 Ohmi, T., Miyashita, M., Itano, M., Imaoka, T., and Kawanabe, I., IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. ED–39 (3), 537 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar