Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:36:38.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stress Evolution and Notch Formation During Polysilicon Gate Electrode Etching

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Michael A. Vyvoda
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering University of California at Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720
David B. Graves
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering University of California at Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720
Get access

Abstract

We have developed a numerical simulation based on the boundary element method that models thermal contraction-induced stresses within semiconductor microstructures, and the effects of these stresses on surface evolution. The test case we have studied is that of polysilicon gate etch during over-etching in a plasma environment. We assume a local etch rate proportional to the normal component of the surface strain energy density gradient caused by the differential thermal contraction of polysilicon substrate and underlying silicon dioxide film. This leads to the prediction of stress-enhanced etching in the area near the polysilicon / gate oxide interface, where large stresses develop during cooling from deposition temperature to room temperature. It is proposed that stress-enhanced etching of this nature may be partially responsible for a common type of deleterious feature observed experimentally during gate electrode patterning known as “notching”.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Nozawa, T., Kinoshita, T., Nizhizuka, T., Narai, A., Inoue, T., and Nakaue, A., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 34, Part 1, No. 4B, p. 2107 (1995).Google Scholar
[2]Hwang, G. S. and Giapis, K. P., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 15, p. 70 (1997).Google Scholar
[3]Sawin, H. H., private communication, 1996.Google Scholar
[4]Chang, J. P. and Sawin, H. H., 441th National Symposium of the American Vacuum Society, unpublished, 1997.Google Scholar
[5]Chang, J. P. and Sawin, H. H., Annual Meeting of the AIChE, unpublished, 1997.Google Scholar
[6]Winters, H. F. and Haarer, D., Phys. Rev. B, 36, p.6613 (1987).Google Scholar
[7]Brebbia, C. A. and Dominguez, J., Boundary Elements: An Introductory Course, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1992.Google Scholar
[8]Danson, D. in Progress in Boundary Element Methods, ed. by Brebbia, C. A., p. 101134 (1983).Google Scholar