Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:35:36.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Strength of Gold Nanowires and Nanoporous Gold

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Rui Dou
Affiliation:
[email protected]@hotmail.com, Materials Science Centre, School of Materials, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
Brian Derby
Affiliation:
[email protected], Materials Science Centre, School of Materials, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
Get access

Abstract

We have measured the yield strength of gold nanowires with diameters in the range from 30 to 70 nm fabricated by electro-deposition into porous alumina templates. All nanowire sizes showed yield strengths much greater than polycrystalline gold with the 30 nm specimens having a yield strength of 1.4 GPa. We found no significant work hardening at plastic strains up to 30%. The strength of the nanowires as a function of wire diameter follows the same trend as has been found for the compression strength of larger gold pillars reported in the literature. TEM observations of deformed wires are consistent with mechanisms of dislocation induced deformation. The strength of nanoporous gold nanowires measured by uniaxial compression test is also reported here. Although two different mechanisms are thought to operate in gold nanowires and nanoporous gold respectively, their strengths show very similar dependence on wire or ligament diameter. However the nanoporous material shows significant strain hardening.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Greer, J.R., Oliver, W.C. and Nix, W.D., Acta Mater. 53 1821 (2005).Google Scholar
2. Greer, J.R. and Nix, W.D., Phys. Rev. B. 73 245410 (2006).Google Scholar
3. Volkert, C.A. and Lilleodden, E.T., Philos. Mag. 86 5567 (2006).Google Scholar
4. Nix, W.D., Greer, J.R., Feng, G. and Lilleodden, E.T., Thin Solid Films 515 3152 (2007).Google Scholar
5. Masuda, H. and Fukuda, K., Science 268 1466 (1995).Google Scholar
6. Masuda, H., Yamada, H., Asoh, M, H., Nakao, M. and Tamamura, T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 71 2770 (1997).Google Scholar
7. Dou, R, and Derby, B.. Scripta Mater. 59 151154 (2008).Google Scholar
8. Gibson, L.J., Ashby, M.F.. Proc. Royal Soc. Lon. A; 382A: 4359 (1982).Google Scholar
9. Park, H.S., Gall, K. and Zimmerman, J.A., J. Mech. Phys. Sol. 54 1862 (2006).Google Scholar
10. Kizuka, T., Phys. Rev. B. 57 11158 (1998).Google Scholar
11. Ashby, M.F.. Philos. Mag. 21:399424. (1970).Google Scholar