Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T17:37:19.973Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Strain Relaxation in Iv-vi Semiconductor Layers Grown on Silicon (100) Substrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

H. K. Sachar*
Affiliation:
School of Electrical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019.
P. J. McCann
Affiliation:
School of Electrical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019.
X. M. Fang
Affiliation:
School of Electrical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019.
Get access

Abstract

The large thermal expansion coefficient mismatch between IV–VI semiconductors and silicon results in significant tensile strain when structures are cooled down following growth at high temperatures. Molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) growth of PbSe on Si (100) at 280°C on BaF2/CaF2 buffer layers results in high crack-density because of this strain. Interestingly, crack- free layers of PbSe can be grown by LPE on Si (100) by using MBE-grown PbSe/BaF2/CaF2 buffer layer structures. Unlike LPE-grown PbSe layers, however, a high crack-density was observed in Pbl-xSnxSe1-yTey layers grown by LPE on Si (100) using similar buffer layer structures. It is hypothesized that the addition of tellurium, which is known to increase IV-VI material hardness, inhibits plastic deformation and thus crack formation becomes the thermal strain relief mechanism. Ternary Pbl-xSnxSe layers grown by LPE exhibited much lower crack densities as compared to the quaternary layers and supported the conclusion that tellurium induced solid solution hardening occurs in the IV-VI materials system.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Zogg, H. and Huppi, M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 47, 133 (1985).Google Scholar
2.Maissen, C., Masek, J., Zogg, H. and Blunier, S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 53, 1608 (1988).Google Scholar
3.Zogg, H., Maissen, C., Masek, J., Blunier, S., Lambrecht, A. and Tacke, M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 55, 969 (1989).Google Scholar
4.Muller, P., Fach, A., John, J. and Tiwari, A. N., J. Appl. Phys. 79, 1911 (1996).Google Scholar
5.Strecker, B. S., McCann, P. J., Fang, X. M., Hauenstein, R. J., Steen, M. O’, Johnson, M. B., J. Electron. Mater. 26, 444 (1997).Google Scholar
6.Ishizaka, A. and Shiraki, Y., J. of Electrochem. Soc.: Electrochem Sci. and Technol. 133, 666 (1986).Google Scholar
7.McCann, P. J., Fuchs, J., Feit, Z. and Fonstad, C. G., J. Appl. Phys. 62, 2994 (1987).Google Scholar
8.McCann, P. J. and Fonstad, C. G., J. Cryst. Growth 114, 687 (1991).Google Scholar
9.Gangulee, A., Trans. Metall. Soc. AIME 245, 1839 (1969).Google Scholar