Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T22:45:31.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

STM Studies of Ultra-Thin Overlayers of Cu on SrTiO3(001) Surfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Yong Liang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104
D. L. Carroll
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104
Dawn A. Bonnell
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104
Get access

Abstract

Scanning tunneling microscopy has been used to study the initial stage of Cu growth on SrTi03(001) surfaces. Our STM results show that Cu grows initially into 3-D island-like structures. Two different morphologies were observed. In some areas loosely bound individual Cu islands appear preferentially attached to step edges. The islands were frequently relocated by the STM tip during the scanning as a result of tip-surface interaction. Other areas have higher densities of Cu islands that exhibit a narrow size distribution with an average diameter of 70 Å and are homogeneously distributed on those areas. The driving force for the morphological evolution of Cu on the SrTiO3(001) surface is discussed in terms of surface free energy and interfacial interaction of metal on transition metal oxide surfaces.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Diebold, U., -M. Pan, J., and Madey, T. E., Phys. Rev. B47,3868 (1993).Google Scholar
2 -M. Pan, J., Diebold, U., Zhang, L., and Madey, T. E., Surf. Sci. 295,411 (1993).Google Scholar
3 -M. Pan, J. and Madey, T. E., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. Ail, 1167 (1993).Google Scholar
4 Zhang, Z. and Henrich, V. E., Surf. Sci. 277,263 (1992).Google Scholar
5 Leyrer, J., Margraf, R., Taglauer, E., and Knozinger, H., Surf. Sci. 201,603, (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Imaduddin, S. and Lad, R. J., Surf. Sci. 290, 35 (1993).Google Scholar
7 He, J. and Moller, P. J., Surf. Sci. 178, 934 (1986).Google Scholar
8 Mukhopadhaya, S. M. and Chen, C. S., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A104 3545 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Gautier, M., P Duraud, J., and Van, L. P., Surf. Sci. 249, L327 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10 Liang, Y. and Bonnell, D. A., Surf. Sci. L510,285 (1993).Google Scholar
11 Matsumoto, T., Tanaka, H., Kawai, T., and Kawai, S., Surf. Sci. 278, L153, (1992).Google Scholar
12 Overbury, S. H., Bertrand, P. A., and Somorjai, G. A., Chem. Rev. 75, 547 (1975).Google Scholar
13 Lindsay, S. M., in Scanning Tunneling Microscopy and Spectroscopv. Theory. Techniques, and Applications, edited by Bonnell, D. A. (VCH Publishers 1993) pp. 335 Google Scholar
14 Weast, R. C., Astle, M. J., and Beyer, W. H., Eds., CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Phvsics (19881989).Google Scholar
15 Mackrodt, W. C., Phys. Chem. Minerals, 15,228 (1988).Google Scholar