Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:33:00.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Steady-State Fluorescence Anisotropy Studies of Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Sensors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Yin-Chu Chen
Affiliation:
Biomedical Engineering Department, Oregon Health Science University, Portland, OR
Zheming Wang
Affiliation:
Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA
Mingdi Yan
Affiliation:
Chemistry Department, Portland State University, Portland, OR
Scott A. Prahl
Affiliation:
Biomedical Engineering Department, Oregon Health Science University, Portland, OR
Get access

Abstract

Molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) are used as recognition elements in biochemical sensors. In a fluorescence-based MIP sensor system, it can be difficult to distinguish the analyte fluorescence from the fluorescence of the polymer itself. We studied steady-state fluorescence anisotropy of anthracene imprinted in a polymer (polyurethane) matrix. Vertically polarized excitation light was incident on MIP films coated on silicon wafers; vertically and horizontally polarized emission was measured. We compared the fluorescence anisotropy of MIPs with imprinted molecules, MIPs with the imprinted molecules extracted, MIPs with rebound molecules, and non-imprinted control polymers. It is shown that differences in fluorescence anisotropy between the polymers and imprinted fluorescent molecules may provide a means to discriminate the fluorescence of analyte from that of the background polymer.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Haupt, K. and Mosbach, K., Chem. Rev. 100, 2495 (2000).Google Scholar
[2] Kriz, D., Ramstrom, O., and Mosbach, K., Anal. Chem. 69, A345 (1997).Google Scholar
[3] Dickert, F. L., Lieberzeit, P., and Tortschanoff, M., Sens. Actuators, B - Chem. 65, 186 (2000).Google Scholar
[4] Chen, Y.-C., Brazier, J. J., Yan, M., Bargo, P. R., and Prahl, S. A., Sens. Actuators, B - Chem., (accepted for publication).Google Scholar
[5] Aoki, H., Horinaka, J., Ito, S., Yamamoto, M., Katayama, H., Kamigaito, M., and Sawamoto, M., Polym. J. 33, 464 (2001).Google Scholar
[6] Bur, A. J., Vangel, M. G., and Roth, S. C., Polym. Eng. Sci. 41, 1380 (2001).Google Scholar
[7] Sato, N., Sugiura, K., Ito, S., and Yamamoto, M., Langmuir 13, 5685 (1997).Google Scholar
[8] Morrison, M. E., Dorfman, R. C., Clendening, W. D., Kiserow, D. J., Rossky, P. J., and Webber, S. E., J. Phys. Chem. 98, 5534 (1994).Google Scholar
[9] Pokorna, V., Vyprachticky, D., Pecka, J., and Mikes, F., Macromol. Chem. Phys. 202, 155 (2001).Google Scholar
[10] Wandelt, B., Turkewitsch, P., Wysocki, S., and Darling, G. D., Polymer 43, 2777 (2002).Google Scholar
[11] Brazier, J. J., Yan, M., Prahl, S. A., and Chen, Y.-C. in Molecularly Imprinted Materials Sensors and Other Devices, edited by Shea, K. J., Roberts, M. J., and Yan, M., (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 723, Pittsburgh, PA, 2002) pp. 115120.Google Scholar
[12] Stenger, D. A., Georger, J. H., Dulcey, C. S., Hickman, J. J., Rudolph, A. S., Nielsen, T. B., McCort, S. M., and Calvert, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 8435 (1992).Google Scholar
[13] Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy, by Lakowicz, Joseph R., (Plenum Publisher, 2nd edition, 1999)Google Scholar